% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • cityapartment cityapartment May 20, 2011 10:46 AM Flag

    Pascua Lama Location

    Dear pascuaforensic,
    Your posts for the last couple days seem to suggest that Barrick's, Pascua Lama is not where the ore body is? You seem to suggest it is somewhere else entirely.

    Do you know via a map of some kind, or by some other means, that Barrick has been lying about their ownership and location of Pascua Lama? If so, could you elaborate in plain language for me. If I have misunderstood your comments please feel free to correct me.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Thanks for the question

      Yes, I saw a series of maps showing MINA PASCUA the mountain as an eliptical shape elongated at the bottom of the maps (handrawn)

      At the middle of the same maps at the right handside, there is another hand drawn shape (OPEN PIT Barrick to con SILVER WHEATON)

      In fact Barrick's 2011 Open pit depiction to Silver Wheaton falls right otside of PASCUA & LAMA

      100% outside of properties Barrick paid 1.5+ Billion to LAC as MINA PASCUA...

      why barrick? why escape the USD40oz cost MINA PASCUA?

      in my opinion and facts...

      Because Barrick lost Mina Pascua itself and does not want the public/SEC/Banks/RCMP-IMET/IRS/the system to know.

      • 1 Reply to pascuaforensics
      • all maps are at

        www . minapascuachile . com

        check the front page & links to maps...

        while there visit the satellite image with mining property at PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL, why would Barrick run away from the mountain it published as PASCUA as it appears at the website's front page?

        No Glaciers there... far away yes... where barrick drew its new open pit...


        They also altered the Argentina Chile border to con Silver Wheaton more.

17.035+0.505(+3.06%)2:20 PMEDT