you are viewing a single comment's thread.
Thanks for the questionYes, I saw a series of maps showing MINA PASCUA the mountain as an eliptical shape elongated at the bottom of the maps (handrawn) At the middle of the same maps at the right handside, there is another hand drawn shape (OPEN PIT Barrick to con SILVER WHEATON)In fact Barrick's 2011 Open pit depiction to Silver Wheaton falls right otside of PASCUA & LAMA100% outside of properties Barrick paid 1.5+ Billion to LAC as MINA PASCUA...why barrick? why escape the USD40oz cost MINA PASCUA?in my opinion and facts...Because Barrick lost Mina Pascua itself and does not want the public/SEC/Banks/RCMP-IMET/IRS/the system to know.
all maps are at www . minapascuachile . comcheck the front page & links to maps...while there visit the satellite image with mining property at PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL, why would Barrick run away from the mountain it published as PASCUA as it appears at the website's front page?No Glaciers there... far away yes... where barrick drew its new open pit...crooks!They also altered the Argentina Chile border to con Silver Wheaton more.