% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • cityapartment cityapartment Jul 7, 2011 2:07 AM Flag

    Who owns Mina Pascua - Report by Expert

    Great job providing the information you did. I know it is already public but so often we quickly forget about the past and fixate on the present, or hope for the future. Nevertheless, it is always important to remember the past, or be reminded of it, so-as to clarify and crystalize our thoughts, especially when the naysayers come calling. Reading your posts has renewed my enthusiasm for MWRs prospects and it seems only a matter of time until ABX is proven to be at fault at Pascua.

    While I, personally, have no wish to see investors hurt, I do demand that the regulators do their job properly now, one they have seemingly failed at doing for many years in this case, and bring those involved at ABX to justice, while enabling MWR and Jorge to move forward expeditiously and prosper.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Thanks cityapartment. It's obvious the disputed Tesoros claims are injunctioned due to the original 2006 judgement.

      It's obvious ABX included those claims injunctioned in there filings and the Pascua Lama Protocol

      It's obvious the Amerillos 1-3000 claims are only salt claims and shouldn't be included in the Pascua Lama Protocol for the extraction of Gold, Silver ect

      It's obvious Mr Lopehandia by way of these expert surveyor reports say Mr Lopehandia hold title to these disputed Tesoros and Amerillos claims.

      The question we're all asking is why is ABX including claims as theirs when those claims are clearly not theirs via injunction.

17.42-0.97(-5.27%)Aug 30 4:00 PMEDT