Why is Peter Munk and Barrick so silent these days ON THE RUN?
Before ABX would sue befotre the other party stopped speaking something against them
Now they are mum, silent ON THE RUN? from MWR"S president?
wow, how cowards react when found guilty...
ABX is a shame of a company... a rosary of money laundring offshore outlets to STEAL & CONCEAL MINA PASCUA PONZI SCHEEEME 1996-2011
Shame on barrick's criminal insiders
Shame on their defenders, coverup-ppers and supporters.
You have the law coming to nail you for sure Peter SKUNK MUNK
Congrats, you will be rich beyond belief, as soon as Barrick has to cough Pascua to your corporate books.
What were the fundamentals that brought you to MWR then and what keeps you in, now?
Me spoke person for MWR?
You have to be nuts
I am on record against Barrick exposing the fraud, even before MWR met or dealt with Mr. Lopehandia.
On public record.
I have no specific contract or deed to act as spoke person for MWR. That is your role.
You are the one that is ordering me to stop refrring to MWR.
Now that we are clear with that.
Please answer honestly the posed questions.
Since you asked me why my rabid anger with a company I do not own stock ay?
Is because I have seeing people die, because of the crimes of Barrick
I have been privy to 100's of destitute families of miners robbed of their assets by Barrick and the guy that appears in the Canadian lawsuit against Mina Pascua owner, Mr. Lopehandia, another criminal ALEJANDRO MORENO PROHENS.
A jackal to Chile miners.
I have anger against Barrick for they publish criminal information and they are protected like BERN MADDOF was, even as it is clear, by MWR"S shareholders now.
Get a grip with reality.
I have been investigating and following up these crimes for over a decade.
Researched what others have not.
Are you or are you not aware of why MWR"S president has challenged Barrick at Pascua?
What is the fundamental that brought you to invest in MWR when and large shareholder or token to play board games?
nice retort, laughed a lot...
If it hurts your feelings...
I shall not use MWR in my future postings, unless referring to information of public record placed forth by MWR to the public, is that fair?
I respect MWR sharholders as much as Barrick's do not take me wrong.
One thing is to be so specific about the crimes of Peter Munk and Barrick, that only mentioning them, is offensive to anyone, I know.
Another thing is to say that I am not right. I can prove it.
Imagine for the people I know in many countries affected by Barrick's crimes directly for decades.
How do you think they feel? Would they approve of my messages?
They would love to own a wheel of a VW, that I know, as most have been sent to destitution and dispair, thanks to the abusive financial terorirsm practices of Barrick worldwide.
Lucky you that are able to tell off those ones who stand beside the efforts of your company president.
I do so, for I see that MWR"S president is acting on the right side of the law.
Again, sorry that other people's reality is offensive to you.
I do not see your postings against other Barrick defenders that laugh and insult MWR, point taken tthat you pick on who defends it.
However please consider, that
Peter Munk and Barrick have sent thousands to death, inanition, no education, dispair, loss, broken families, lost jobs, promised jobs never delivered, fraud on contracting in Chile, fraud to mining property, a list larger than a phone book.
You have the right not to read my postings too
You may put me in ignore if you think "my rantings" are not verifiable and fully documented legal facts, affecting criminally OSC _SEC published AMARILLOS 1-3000 and TESOROS as owned by BARRICK 2011.
Nothing will change the facts or the truth.
However, if my postings save one dollar from an innocent investor, I consider myself paid.
If my postings ever make it to a Court of law, Barrick shall not be able to disprove any.
Why do you think Barrick is mum against your president?
What do you think of your president's stand against Barrick? ANDY LLOYD - STOCKWATCH?
What fundamental made you invest in MWR and how long are you holding that stock.?
Thanks for an honest reply.
With you insane ranting and raving you may want to tell us why you have such a rabid hate for a company that you are not invested in as well as why you pretend to be the spokesperson for MWR that as you say you have nothing to do with
Really do not know what you P.F. are trying to accomplish here with your ranting drivel except to make yourself look like a raving lunatic but as an MWR owner I do not think that I like you including us in your repetitive rants as if we approve of you, lowering us to your name calling. With that grow up act your age and not your shoe size, as your credibility is rapidly disapearing
Dear MWR shareholder
My respects to you.
Hope you are not a Barrick addict too or Vick Erickson who just renounced.
Please do indicate what part of the message hurts your feelings.
Tjhe fact that Barrick is a cesspool of criminals?
The fact that Barrick filed SEC-OSC criminal impersonation of assets that are indeed 100% property of interest to MWR?
Please elaborate what is your problem really?
That I am too often calling these crooks to face MWR"S president since MWR announced its challenge?
Please be so kind as to tell me, what have you done as MWR shareholder to DD?
Since when it is a sin to remind criminals that they are in overt fraud to the public?
Or that they have filed criminal info at SEC - OSC?
Please elaborate so that I may understand your stance.
I could also buy a share of ABX and rant as an ABX shareholder.