Exchanges were dupped.
TESOROS concessions were never Barrick owned assets.
Banks were taken and accomplices of ABX to con the system, criminal acts shall meet the harshest punishment at law, that Chile has to offer to commercial crimes.
How indicent of shameful ABX executives to brag about Pascua 2013 when in Chile ABX is castrated of Pascua.
is like Pascua 2000 it never happenned
Nor did Pascua 2003, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010,2012, why 2013?
Peter Munk is Chile bound and this time you will attend riminal Courts only, Peter. It was written.
His entourage shall be the same clowns peddling Pascua PONZI SCHEEME plus regulators at TSX BCSC and NYSE
Plus financial clowns to cite where did they get their ABX FRADMENTALS
ABX shall kiss off Chile forever the way it looks.
Any asset sale, shall be monitored, enforced as crimes to Buyer and seller shoiuld ABX unload oine Chile asset.
ABX is now under the watchful eye of Chilean law.
anything they do, say or lie, shall be used against them immediately at PASCUA PONZI SCHEEME criminal proceedings which appear to be under full speed in Chile
Barrick is liable to the shareholders of MWR MSX 100% as Barrick lied against them December 21, 2011 as proven in Chile now.
The courts look bent on acting at law, unshakeable v. ABX.
Barrick sent rookies to jump Pascua areas recently and were rejected by court decisions on defense filings by a Mr. Lopehandia legal team.
Absurd to have new claims for Barrick Chile boys, in areas ABX bought from LAC 1994. It evidences further criminal activity indeed.
There is something going on in Chile Pascua claims area, ABX team has shown to be tossing bogus claim after bogus claim, even Randall Oliphant has his XTRATA clients intruding nearby Pascua. why?
Is there a secret not yet told ABX?
All free zone tax paradise executives and ABX executives worldwide stand to be called to Chile very fast now to respond for their collective crimes of impersonation of ownership, title and machinations against injunction C-1912-2001 in full contempt at PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL and since 2001 to date trading stolen asset and titles.
last one out, shut off the lights please
You are confused and conflating two different areas. (I think the conflation is deliberate by some people and inadvertent by others who are ignorant of the difference.) Pascua Lama, which ABX does own, and Mina Pascua are not the same locations. Mina Pascua, to which JL purportedly has title thru his Amarillos Sur and Nord claims is located on what I call the disputed claims area. The pit for the ABX mine named Pascua Lama is not located on those claims. Even JL agrees that ABX has not been exploring or developing on the disputed claim area.
The fact remains that if JL eventually does get clear title for the disputed claims, which he currently doesn't because HUL still is the registered owner of the Tesoros claims by virtue of prior court cases, which the mining court itself can not negate, it will not interfere with the ABX Pascua Lama mine.
At best, if JL succeeds in getting clear title (I don't know if he will or not, but it will take years), he will have not a mine, but an undeveloped, mostly undrilled mining claim of unknown feasibility in the vincinity of ABX's working mine.
Well, you are hopeful, but I don't see any evidence for your position.
MSX states that, as regards to their Chilean mining claims,"There was no significant developments during the month of April 2012."
Bad grammar aside, even MSX reports that there is no story.
Next question is why are you talking to me over here when you claimed to put me on ignore on the IHUB or was that just for the cheerleaders over there to make you seem like a good boy and a winner and a part of the flock getting ready to be fleeced
right out to lunch on that assumption quer, not even close just a guy who follows this very closely and sees your negative attitude posts all the time demanding answers so guess again or just believe that I am an investor who does not put up with bs from you or others