% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Aug 16, 2012 8:51 PM Flag

    ABX 2012 Appeal 100% a FRAUD of ABX

    1. ABX is no part of Villar{s Trials that is a lie as MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA and MINERA NEVADA SpA (ABX 2012) admitted in Court not to own TESOROS at the center of the Appeal.

    2. HECTOR UNDA LLANOS of TESOROS at the Appeal, figures as having 0% ties to MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA and MINERA NEVADA SpA hence leaving the PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL as an illegal nulla nd void PUBLIC INSTRUMENT IN CHILE.

    3. SUc is the basis of CRIMINAL ACTION accepted by Chiñlean Tribunals v. ABX Chile.

    4. Rotted egg furball is shaky in all her/his/its information.
    *I'm starting to think this is Jorge Lopehandia's way of "saving face", as he knows now that he's going to lose his appeal of Action No. C-1912-2001 (Mr. Villar's lawsuit to get back his plot of land that he sold Barrick for $20). Probably the reason why he is going to lose C-1912-2001 is the "libel and perjury" that Barrick's subsidiary in Chile committed. This would be the "recent alarming events in Chile" - of course it would be alarming if Jorge Lopehandia loses C-1912-2001 to Barrick. Just a guess.


    No probables here rotted furball

    CRIMINAL TRIAL and is ABX the guilty until proven its innocense and guess what?

    GUILTY AS CHARGED will be the verdict. 100/100

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
18.11-0.42(-2.27%)Sep 23 4:00 PMEDT