% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Jul 10, 2013 11:19 PM Flag

    INVESTORS BEWARE lawsuits of Lopehandia, clean current PASCUA TITLE OWNER are NOT for title rights

    The lawsuits are part of a law enforcement drive to jail Peter Munk, all Canadian participants in fraud to OSC and whomever of fraud to SEC and IRS in USA.

    THUS, multiple lawsuits v. Barrick have ensued

    Even if Mr. Lopehandia lost every lawsuit trying to jail the culprits or collecting 17 years of damage and financial terrorism, Mr. Lopehandia still will hold the ONLY VALID METALLIC concessions over Mina Pascua

    At the end of the day if no victory, ABX will have as legal the SALTS & NITRATES concessions bought from LAC MINERALS 1994 which DO NOT ALLOW for Gold production At Law in Chile (See Chilean Mining legislation regarding no metallic concessions) such is a fraud to PASCUA PROSPECTUS the original deal, transformed into PASCUA LAMA PONZI SCHEEME.

    In other words MULTIPLE CRIMES called for multiple lawsuits to jail the culprits...

    Why all accepted in Chile? Because Lopehandia demonstrated clean title thus far, enough to get charges laid v Barrick as Jorge Lopehandia and more recently as MSX.

    Even Mr. Lopehandia defeated Government of Chile twice in first instance and Appeal, to open formal court investigation of PASCUA LAMA FRAUD by Barrick and bribed civil servants along the way, PANDORA BOX OPENED days ago

    So if anyone tells you that BETTER WAIT THE OUTCOME OF THE LAWSUITS to decide PASCUA MINE OWNERSHIP is fooling the public.

    As done by Barrick when causing last environmental damage to the project, delivering itself to be sanctioned.

    ABX Project stopped due to ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES

    rather than the excrutiating truth

    ABX never held clean title at PASCUA PONZI SCAM

    more over PETER MUNK and pirats cohorts, only held 1994 to date SALTS & NITRATES CONCESSIONS ONLY.

    Hence the need of ABX to lie to OSC and SEC filing TESOROS concessions as owned, instead of AMARILLOS 1-3000 salts & nitrates, both are flawed at criminally charged PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL


    Lopehandia MSX hold Pascua 2013

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Pascua Lama Deposit is located on titles Barrick doesn't own.


      Catalino Albanez Vergara, Ingeniero Ejecución en Minas [T.N.: This appears to mean Mining Enforcement Engineer; hereinafter I.E.M.], Expert Mine Surveyor since 1980 and Court-accredited Expert for the Appeals Court of La Serena, domiciled at “Pasaje Los Olivos 955”, La Serena, hereby states:

      1.-Nevada Mining Company 1994 PASCUA-LAMA PROJECT THE AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000.- This mineral deposit (PASCUA-LAMA project) is located inside of the AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000 mining properties and it is in turn located within the groups of mining properties TESORO FIVE and TESORO SEVEN, where they are located as shown in the report presented to COREMA and the pertinent entities and public opinion for the purpose of obtaining the corresponding sectoral permits for the development of the mineral deposit denominated PASCUA-LAMA, which is complemented with photographs from “GEOGLE” [presumably “GOOGLE”] showing the whole yellow mountain (alteration deposit) which is also mentioned in the official Survey Record, in the chapter entitled “Acceso al HM” [Access to HM]; the same is described in later surveys of the TESORO FIVE and TESORO SEVEN groups.

      CONCLUSIONS REGARDING LEGAL TITLE AUTHORITY AS AT JUNE 15, 2011. To this date there are no valid marginal annotations on these title deeds in the name of Barrick Gold Corporation-ABX of Canada, Barrick Chile or Minera Nevada Limitada, according to an original copy of same which I have before me. The original 2011 copy DOES certify by means of a marginal annotation the litigious rights of Mr. Jorge R. Lopehandia Cortes as the first-claim legal right to title.

      FINAL CONCLUSION The properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000 and TESOROS should not have been included in the list of mining properties as being the property of BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION-ABX of Canada, due to the fact that these properties have not been nor are they now registered in the name of said firm at the Registrar of Mines of the City of Vallenar, in the Atacama Region, Republic of Chile, in conformity with Chilean law. Moreover, these title deeds could not have been transferred or sold or contracted in any manner whether in Chile or abroad due to the fact that a prohibition is in place, granted by a Chilean Court which prohibits the carrying out of actions or execution of contracts.

    • Since the concessions that JL purports to own, which he calls "Mina Pascua", do not cover the location of the Pascua Lama mine pit at the UTM coordinates designated in Barrick's 43-101 on file at Sedar and the SEC, the ability for anyone to mine on the "Mina Pascua" areas is immaterial to Pascua Lama.

      The Pascua Lama mine pit is not on any of the Amarillos or Tesoros concessions, therefore what can or cannot be mined on those concessions is totally irrelevant. JL has conceded that "Mina Pascua" is 11 kilometers away from Pascua Lama, and any check of the UTM coordinates prove that the two do not overlap.

      So "even if JL lost every lawsuit' and he "still will hold the ONLY VALID METALLIC concessions over Mina Pascua", he will have spent a lot of money on legal fees for something he says he already owns that would not interfere with the mining of Pascua Lama if he did win. Tres bizarre, n'est pas?

      • 3 Replies to mtstack2000
      • Mtstack you are wrong and you are only trying hard to misdirect investors with Barrick fraud at Pascua Lama.

        The titles Barrick never owned yet fraudulently included into Barricks Pascua Lama SEC 6K and OSC 43-101 and the Pascua Lama Protocol Chilean regulatory filings cover the deposit of Pascua Lama and have been subject to a court ordered injunction since 2001. The injunction of 2001 prevented Barrick from trying to claim jump Mr Lopehandia with the Tesoro titles, Tesoro tiles are today registered in the name of Mr Lopehandia. Barrick has never been able to obtain domain or the rights for Tesoro and Amarillo 1-3000, domain is in the name of Mr Jorge Lopehandia with his clean titles and rights to mine the deposit of Pascua Lama on the Chile side. This is why Barrick has not mined Pascua since they were building Pascua in 1997 for $500 million, with production set for the year 2000.

        Expert 3rd Party Pascua Lama Technical Report locates the deposit of Pascua Lama on titles Barrick does not own. Do not get deceived by mtstack2000 or any of the other biased ABX faithfools. It's all a Barrick fraud. Tell Barrick to remove the fraud of these titles Tesoro 1 1/3 to Tesoro 12 1/5 and AMARILLO 1-3000 off of their books.

      • Hopefully you dont believe the BS you are Spewing.....Either way take this opportunity to exit this fraud...It IS GOING TO ZERO............

      • I would like to know if the government of Chile will give back all or some of the money they have already received from Barricks.

16.85+0.20(+1.20%)Oct 27 4:00 PMEDT