red: do your homework, the law provides the judge up to 60days to provide a verdict, this has been fact and all over the post for weeks. They simply stated the obvious, but as Edvacourt said, that not only is unlikely but its usually within 7 days. Would you rather they told you what the judge was doing to do and cause a mistrial????? Dont post comments until you know your facts.
Edvacourt has done nothing but provide biased opinions. I will never forget the day it went up to 4.47, then started tumbling down to an intraday low of 1.75. Do you remember that day? It was the day of the Laches ruling. That day Edvacourt stated it was a GOOD day for VRNG. Unless this is the twilight zone, I'd tend to disagree with that. The fact is cases that involve large cap stocks like GOOG can drag on for eternity and severely whallop a company like VRNG that survives on hype and speculation. As time goes on and no new news is released, inevitably all stocks slowly bleed as does the volume. I could be wrong on the timing, but know I'm right on the latter.
Aww a couple more idiots. What's wrong you are holding worthless nov puts or shares you shorted sub 3? If they said a couple months it means it will be resolved in less. Also if it did take even three months (which it won't) 100 %+ returns in a market that is losing 100-200 points a day across the board isn't too bad. Get a clue shorty, or a better tactic anyone thats not willing to wait a few weeks for even 30% gains probably isn't investing significant capital.