If you had a response about something relevant....then you would have already posted their response to your question.
And, while you now try to distinguish between NEW ones and expanded ones.....you got that idea from the word expanded that is NOT the ND state's wording....that is how I compiled the list from their list.
I like the way you changed the tune from they are not economical to build.....because you incorrectly see them as short lived....to not too many will be built....to oh, lots of them will be built all over.
And, on this:
"That's why I keep saying you can't comprehend, and either simply can't due to lack of education, or refuse to."
Typical & funny.
That is what you do when you see the ND data, know that you are incorrect, know that everyone clearly sees it, and just hope that by being vague and insulting that maybe some might believe you instead of the ND state data that shows otherwise.....well...maybe?
So, now you invented some fictious discrepency in something....just more games?
"Why don't you e-mail the ND Pipeline Commission and ask about the discrepancy? I did, and got an answer."
Like I said before...if you asked something relevany....and had some response....you would have posted whatever it is....but based on your posting history and the concoctions you dream up....I do not only have no idea what you are talking about because you were intentionally vague ....whatever it is probably does not even exist.
If otherwise...go ahead and post it....
you like to cut and paste...so lets see this fiction...or, it seems that you rather change the topic to which schools I did or did not graduate?
I thought we did all that when we discussed Jack's PhD& JD sometime last year.