Sunday, 04 Nov 2012 10:19 AM
By Patrick Hobin
The New York Daily News, the country’s fifth largest newspaper, endorsed Mitt Romney on Sunday, joining the ranks of more than a dozen papers that have turned away from Barack Obama after endorsing his candidacy in 2008.
The paper's endorsement came as a surprise: the News has a staunchly Democratic editorial viewpoint. The Daily News is also owned by one of the country's most respected and influential Democrats, Mort Zuckerman, the billionaire real estate mogul.
But the New York daily staked its arguments against Obama not on politics but the economy, charging that President Obama’s promises went unfulfilled.
“Revival of the U.S. as a land of opportunity and upward mobility is the central challenge facing the next president,” the paper wrote. “The question for Americans: Who is more likely to accomplish the mission — Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?”
“Four years ago, the Daily News endorsed Obama, seeing a historic figure whose intelligence, political skills and empathy with common folk positioned him to build on the small practical experience he would bring to the world’s toughest job. We valued Obama’s pledge to govern with bold pragmatism and bipartisanship. The hopes of those days went unfulfilled.”
The Daily News argued that Obama inherited a difficult economic situation but did not provide the right guidance to lead an economic revival.
“The trend over the Obama years: Goodbye to middle- and high-income jobs in New York City; hello to positions that pay less than $45,000 a year,” the paper wrote.
“Recovery from the disaster that Obama inherited was going to take time. But four years is a long, long slog. Had the president guided a typical upswing, America would by now have regained essentially all its lost jobs. At his present pace, Obama would reach that milestone in the third year of a second term. The regrettable truth is that Obama built a record of miscalculations and missed opportunities,” the Daily News editorial said.
The paper, which is considered the publication of working class New Yorkers, even took Obama to task for Obamacare.
“After originally projecting that the program would produce 4 million more jobs than the country now has, along with a 5 percent jobless rate, Obama pleads that he saved Americans from more dire straits,” it wrote.
“Next came Obamacare. While the country bled jobs, the president battled to establish universal health insurance — without first restraining soaring medical bills. Then he pushed one of the largest social programs in U.S. history through a Democratic-controlled Congress without a single Republican vote. R.I.P. and never to be resurrected — Obama’s promised bipartisanship.”
The Daily News said Romney’s approach to fix the economy would be “stronger”
“Critically, he has tailored his policies to create jobs, jobs, jobs,” the Daily News wrote.
“The centerpieces of Romney’s plan call for spending restraint and rewriting the Internal Revenue code to lower rates by 20 percent. He would make up much of the lost revenue by eliminating deductions and loopholes that have made the tax system a thicket of strangling complexities. On its own, paring the personal and corporate rules to the basics would catalyze business and consumer spending.”
In the end, the paper’s endorsement came down to who could better get the country back on sound economic footing. It concluded its editorial with:
“The presidential imperative of the times is to energize the economy and get deficits under control to empower the working and middle classes to again enjoy the fruits of an ascendant America.
“So the News is compelled to stand with Romney.”
© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
People awoke long time ago to the radical left. Libs are too dogmatic (kneejerk came before progressive). Thanks to us Indies to save the country. Libs are not kool and kool will get you injured.
Iowa's largest newspaper has endorsed Mitt Romney, delivering a blow to President Barack Obama, who it endorsed in 2008.
The Des Moines Register's editorial board wrote that Obama's "best efforts to resuscitate the stumbling economy have fallen short. Nothing indicates it would change with a second term in the White House."
Romney becomes the first Republican the paper has endorsed since 1972.
According to Editor & Publisher, Republican Mitt Romney is stunning the newspaper world, earning 112 endorsements from editorial boards around the country compared to the President’s 84. Most large market newspapers like the The New York Times and The Washington Post have stuck with Obama, but have run less than glowing assessments of his accomplishments. So while a newspaper endorsement may not mean what it once did, these conversions could be telling of a national trend.
“Iowa's largest newspaper has endorsed Mitt Romney, delivering a blow to President Barack Obama…these conversions could be telling of a national trend.”
Yes, the trend you folks have of data manipulation.
Sat Oct 27, 2012 at 02:20 PM PDT
With eight days to go before the 2012 election, 71 daily and 31 weekly or twice-weekly papers have endorsed Obama; 102 daily and 27 weekly newspapers have endorsed Romney.
It should be noted that 20 of Romney's weekly endorsements come from small-circulation papers in Minnesota owned by Forum Communications.
So, eliminating those 20, and you’re saying Romney has 7 more endorsements than Obama. What does an endorsement actually do? It provides readers of those papers someone else’s opinion. Whether or not the readers are influenced is dubious at best. But if they are, what’s the important factor...how many papers picked one over the other? No, of course not. It’s how many readers in each of those cities read the endorsement to be exposed to that influence. Whether or not they act accordingly is anyone’s guess...but if they do, check out these numbers. (And these INCLUDE the 20 small papers in Minnesota) Almost two to one...and not in support of your purported “national trend.”
Total circulation of the newspapers endorsing Obama: 14.4 million
Total for Romney: 8.6 million
Think 8 million difference matters? If endorsements matter, I would think so. Romney actually has a lead in the total number of endorsements in swing states...but whether they are the right papers, remains to be seen. For example, here in the all important state of Ohio, Romney is endorsed by The Columbus Dispatch and The Cincinnati Enquirer. Obama by The Cleveland Plain Dealer, The Akron Beacon Journal and The Toledo Blade.
Total Circulation for Romney endorsements = 280,188
Total Circulation for Obama endorsements = 428,826
Do people even read newspapers anymore? We’ll see.