% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Charles & Colvard Ltd. Message Board

  • youarenotajedi youarenotajedi Oct 28, 2010 11:05 PM Flag

    Way too much inventory!!!! $37 mil in inv!

    With sales of about $10 million per year they have way too much inventory almost 4 years worth! They could be forced to writedown or heavily discount this inventory which would cause losses. See what they said here:

    Total inventory, including long-term and consignment inventory, approximated $37.7 million as of September 30, 2010

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • stellarbeautysuperiorbrilliance stellarbeautysuperiorbrilliance Nov 2, 2010 1:57 PM Flag

      Thanks again for posting your viewpoints. We can agree on some points, and debate others. Your viewpoint as a new follower/investor is appreciated.

      I don't see the inventory as a problem. It doesn't become obsolete. There is no real cost to carrying (storing) it. I see it as all opportunity at this point. It is paid for. When it sells, they keep all the cash. The accounting numbers (standard metrics) will be what they will be, but the cash will be available for reinvestment.

      Granted, those investors/analysts who don't dig deep (into CTHR) will look at standard metrics, and the inventory will look inappropriate. But CTHR shouldn't be valued on standard ongoing mature-company metrics anyway. (Which also means Mgt shouldn't be bragging about percentage increases in tiny revenue numbers, or small positive earnings due to cost cuts.) Moissanite is a huge opportunity. If C&C can capture that huge opportunity, CTHR shares have lots of upside (JMHO). If they don't capture it hugely, C&C could die on the vine. Again, JMHO.

      There isn't really capital tied up. Unless you mean that they (previous Mgt) could have saved the cash spent on raw SiC and processing (faceting, etc). But that is water (cash) under the bridge at this point.

      I don't think the inventory level should affect the prices they charge. There is no need for that. C&C is the sole source of M. They can charge whatever they want (whatever their salespeople can convince somebody to pay). And the inventory has no carrying cost, so C&C has no need to sell it quickly. They can set prices that maximize the total revenue they will generate over time from the existing inventory plus all future product. They shouldn't lower the price now to sell the inventory quicker, just to improve an accounting inventory number. Personally, I think they should raise the price steadly over time, but that is a whole other discussion.

      <<<If their sales really start growing then the inv is no issue, but if they stay around $10 million annually,....>>>

      I absolutely agree. But if they stay around $10 MM annually, C&C will die. They need to quickly (within a year or two) reach yearly sales levels that will make the current inventory look small. They'll never have a sustainable business at anywhere near the $10 MM/year level, at least not enough to support let alone grow the stock price.

      Old Mgt said (but not a direct quote) $300 MM annually was a good initial (unofficial) target, and should be a no-brainer. The product is that good. There is no reason to shoot for sales below that level. This product should be selling over $1 Billion annually, easily. Because of past failures, the new Mgt must attempt to reach HUGE sales levels very quickly, or else C&C will whither away. Shareholders deserve a decent shot at success. I hope Mgt is aligned with that.

    • Lots of inventory means that future sales will increase cash further. If the company executes on growing sales, it will be cash rich with NO DEBT!!!!

1.18+0.02(+1.72%)Sep 30 12:26 PMEDT