% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Intel Corporation Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • theblueredmonk theblueredmonk Dec 10, 2012 9:30 AM Flag

    Motorola Atom Razr I beats ARM dual-core Razr M in battery

    Motorola XT890, Intel Atom Z2480 @ 2.00 GHz 1 processor, 2 cores

    Score: 1026

    Integer Processor integer performance 844
    Floating Point Processor floating point performance 1161
    Memory Memory performance 1129
    Stream Memory bandwidth performance 992

    motorola DROID RAZR HD, Qualcomm ARMv7 @ 1.51 GHz 1 processor, 2 cores

    Score: 1503

    Integer Processor integer performance 987
    Floating Point Processor floating point performance 2218
    Memory Memory performance 1641
    Stream Memory bandwidth performance 535

    High scores are better.


    • and it is still using 32 nano silicon. My PC run a hell lot faster at 1/3 the power consumption going from 32nano (i5-650) to 22 nano (i7-3770)

    • Medield is not two cores but two threads and you already know that Geekbench is recording it incorrectly so no need to repost the error. How about showing any javascript benchmark in which Krait beats Medfield, oh that's right there are none. Javascript/Browsing performance is more important to a typical phone user than multi-core geekbench performance which is what you are posting. Medfield makes for a better internet phone than Krait and last longer while doing so.

37.19-0.36(-0.96%)Sep 23 4:00 PMEDT