Agreed. Basically the Panel review is mostly saying the same thing taseko has already said will happen. taseko already said they need to drain the lake. It would be funny to believe that the fishes in it can live on dry mud after that right? But by nature the fishes can die of natural clamity even without this project. Creating another lake and binding taseko to protect the fish stock survival in that lake legally would be better if the lobbyists really want to ensure a higher certainty for that stock for both men and bears.