% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Taseko Mines Ltd. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • retaoba retaoba Jul 3, 2010 1:11 AM Flag

    Important Read...

    Agree 100% - Project is not dead, the project has stipulations that can be ment, that is the purpose of the comission, and that is what they did.

    Not sure what kind of delay we are looking at VS what management expected, but I have to think that this is one of their main scenarios.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Agreed. Basically the Panel review is mostly saying the same thing taseko has already said will happen. taseko already said they need to drain the lake. It would be funny to believe that the fishes in it can live on dry mud after that right? But by nature the fishes can die of natural clamity even without this project. Creating another lake and binding taseko to protect the fish stock survival in that lake legally would be better if the lobbyists really want to ensure a higher certainty for that stock for both men and bears.

0.66+0.01(+1.62%)Jul 26 4:00 PMEDT