Didn't anyone else pick up on the fact that the lawsuit that CUST settled was "with prejudice"? That translates that it was without ANY merit! Cook is clearly playing in an unknown minefield and his bogus lawsuit was just evidence of the emperor having no clothes! Leadership like this is steering this ship right towards an iceberg of disaster!
It simply means that CUST cannot file another claim based on the same underlying facts. This could happen for any number of reasons, including, for example, if CPTH and CUST reached some sort of agreement and CUST agreed to drop its claim. One cannot say whether this is good or bad for CUST, but I CAN tell you that you are making a big mistake if you rely on conclusions drawn merely from the fact that the suit was dismissed "with prejudice."
Interesting how CPTH has plummeted since the claim was dismissed. Hmmmmmmm.
are not interested in anything but pure hype. It obviously doesn't matter to them that less than a year ago their heralded CEO was not even in the internet business, and then their first stab at e-bus was abandoned after a couple weeks.
All everyone needs to know can be found by looking at what this company has done over the last year...