very worried with all the posts to this board with the multiple IDs. I find that very encouraging as the Financial Times article in early December flat out says that MWs was WRONG about ONP and that Eric Jackson was CORRECT!
If the companies (GRI) is good wouldn't this answer a lot of the questions? Just wondering... way to much BS on most of these message boards for my liking. Historical pattern mirrors other china stocks of late though.
Meaning...that the sector, what's left of it, is rising? ONP is a good company with good management and four years of audited annual financial reports filed in a timely manner with the SEC. That is FACT and not BS!