Rocker does not have this condundrum
You guys still don't get it do you?
This whole Rocker-Street.com-NY Times-etc "conspiracy" thing is all about introducing volatility into a stock. They trade the thing long and short and make a killing out of the dumb longs AND shorts that follow them around
>>They trade the thing long and short and make a killing<<
"killing"? ha! I doubt it. Least not with NFI.
More like a buncha bums roaming the streets, picking up pennies wherever they can find'em.
They think that's gonna pull'em outta the gutter and replace their lost fortunes.
(you musta missed the negative figures for Rocker Bums so far this year)
I am sorry if my attempts to get you into a reasoned discussion were taken to be personal attacks. I had intended that they be taken as friendly chiding.
However, the chiding aside, you still are only saying 'prove it', 'prove it', over and over. Drty has asked you a reasoned question; you have not answered it. I asked a reasoned question; you have not answered it.
You need to tell me which side of the bed you got out of this morning--so I can avoid doing the same.
Without wrath, of course; bovine.
You've chosen personal attacks in each of your recent responses to me. I think you should reread Dirty's post regarding Rocker's conundrum. It is not incumbent on me to prove that assertions are untrue. Rather, I'd like to hear dirty present his evidence to support his claims. Is that unreasonable?
Drty nor anyone else on this board forced anyone to buy NFI. I'm still under water, but I'm happy to hold the position I do, and happy that there were some posters that cheered, posters that jeered and posters that explained away the fears. I guess that boils down to coming back to my assertions of this morning, which is; you are long on crap and short on fact this morning, chicky baby. You sound like the school yard kid who doesn't have facts on his side--standing around saying 'prove it', 'prove it' to the reasoned arguments--repeating 'why', 'tell me why' to every question asked--while never producing a reasoned argument.
Just MOO, of course; bovine.
Then why not say so... one cannot read your mind... and I know you are more articulate than that.
Hope you get over whatever has set you off this morning... maybe looking at some T&A would do that for you?
Respectfully, of course; bovine.
Literally, you is right. He say 'folks', but his tone said 'fools'. He is posting like a basher today--long on venom and short on fact. Just trying to bring him back to making a reasoned argument. I like reasoned arguments. I don't like 'have you stopped ___________' type of questions that impugn anyone's veracity.