upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;"
I suspect that by engaging in "criticism of individuals" posters have run afoul of this policy and Cadence (or the person being criticized) has requested the post be deleted.
I frankly don't blame them for doing this; I've seen on this board vitriolic attacks directed at certain people (execs or otherwise) and had this sort of attack been leveled at me my first call would be to Yahoo, and my second would have been to a lawyer so I could sue the poster for defamation.
Thanks for the explanation. So aren't executives a little like political figures or celebrities? If not, why not? If we are censored for saying anything negative about any executive of any company, doesn't that make this board less useful?