one claim for one patent and 3 claims are strong (as suggested by the company), why the weakness? If true, the odds are heavy in favor of Rambus. Am I missing something?
A spokesman for Rambus said the three remaining claims were strong. "In a patent infringement lawsuit all you need is one claim and one patent," the spokesman, Gary Harmon, told Reuters.
Yes, I read that. So, if that were the general consensus, why the selloff? Just seems that much closer to the American jury trial to me. A likely win.
No, you are not missing anything. we just need1 out of 3 to win, that means we have 66.66666%chance to win.