She testified today that Tra said Zim looked like a "crazy #$%$ cracker" and that "the (Nword) is now following him."
She comported herself well for one of The People; however, like many of them, her answers were mumbled and it slowed down the proceedings while she had to clarify again and again. They should have had an interpreter.
Her earlier perjury (lied about reason for not attending Tra's funeral) is excusable because she never heard of perjury.
Her statement about Tra's becoming the aggressor probably did not help the prosecution. Maybe she can change her story later as mostly they like to do.
Crackers are defined as what, N haters? I remember watching a PBS (left wing) history show about the history of slavery and blacks in the USA. They offered a supposedly documented interview or discussion with a Florida man long ago where they asked him what he did with his time and his reply was " raising hogs and shooting N's". They defined him as a Cracker. This very old social issue still resonates today. Lincoln made a monumental mistake in not shipping all the slaves back to Africa, then letting normal immigration bring qualified blacks into the country at a later date. We went through a civil war and amendments to our constitution just to accommodate a foreign slave level race for no reason at all save Lincoln's mistake. The constitution was written by whites for whites as a means to divorce England and the King. Nothing more.
Nannysbeak wins the most offensive, most knuckleheaded and coarsest ignorance award of the MONTH!
Sorry spentpsssss, sorry dixinmouth, forget it sped. There is no way you can outdooosh nannysbeak on this one.
"The constitution was written by whites for whites as a means to divorce England and the King. Nothing more." Even someone who never read the constitution couldn't make a claim as stupid as that. Just how stupid are you nannysbreath? Oh, wait...you like turtles.