% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • morepaveway3s morepaveway3s Jun 21, 2011 2:34 PM Flag

    More interesting Chen coverage

    Interesting is right. His blogs are turning into must-reads for all aspiring comedians:

    "...With your stock trading at such low multiple to book value and next twelve month EPS, some institutions should be interested to take significant position in the stocks as a value investment. Have you talked to some big I-banks/funds regarding taking a high stake in your stock?..."

    He's going to ask TOUPS a leading question like that? Chen is starting to sound like Gentry. Gee... I wonder how Toups will answer???

    "...Is the board of direct investigating the possibility of working with lenders to take the company private maybe at 100% premium to correct stock price..."

    WTF? What kind of question is THAT? 100% permium? 'correct' the stock price? Well, *there's* an unbiased analyst if I ever saw one! And someone please tell Chen that the BOD is suppose to work for the EXISTING owners: LPH shareholders. They would approve the sale to someone ELSE, not buy it themselves. <sigh!> Well, maybe in Longwei's case...

    "...and later sell to other buyers or list in other exchanges at a higher valuation multiple?..."

    Chen simply answered his own question: could the BOD(!) make a quick buck by flipping the *stock* after a buyout. Hmmm - apparently not interested in all at the possibility of the BOD or Cai simply running the company for profit after a buyout.

    "...Will the board consider a buyout offer from an institution or private group at, say, 100% - 200% premium over current stock price?..."

    Translated: please make up a fantasy valuation in your answer to replace the "100 - 200% premium' so longs can bleat this as 'proof' of the company's actual value!

    "...Has the board considered making an IPO of the stock in Hong Kong or Shanghai stock exchange (due listing) since many comparables to your stock are trading at P/Es of 15 – 20 on those exchanges?..."

    First of all, LPH would never qualify - that's what they're doin on a U.S. exchange! Second of all, printing more shares at *ANY* other exchange is dilution whether knuckle-draggers realize it or not. Selling a billion shares on the HK exchange does not result in buckets of FREE MONEY for American knuckle-draggers. It only results in a huge chunk of your share value being chopped off and sold to someone else. Is your resulting 'tiny' piece more fairly valued? Who cares... Cai just royally scr#wed you.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Paver, I'm starting to catch a whiff of desperation in your posts. They are no longer arguments or opinions, but simply contradictions. That does not qualify in your quest to be contrarian of the year by the way.

      There are 3 things really that you are missing (on purpose?) in Chen's opinions;

      1) Management (or other) buy out/ Arbitrage - could happen, and could take many different forms. Read up on a few.

      2) Dual listing - check out the rules to list on Hang Seng. They absolutely could qualify, and quite easily.

      3) Industry comparables - See if you can get a copy of R&R's report and check out the valuation multiples of comparable companies. They are 14 - 18x.

      I'm gonna go out on a limb here and pay attention to what the CFA's and their firms publish, rather than your contradictory drivel. Next you'll have Sinopec delivering "virtual gas" into Shanxi....what a clown.

      • 1 Reply to cb_wilson
      • There are three things you are missing about reality, CB:

        1. Buyout? Yeah, we'll see how that pathetic lie goes with HRBN.

        2. Hang Seng? Toups and R&R can't make any money on the Hang Seng, ergo: LPH does not qualify.

        3. If the comparable industry P/E is 14-18x, why is Cai giving away shares for $.25?

        "...I'm gonna go out on a limb here and pay attention to what the CFA's and their firms publish, rather than your contradictory drivel..."

        Do you mean the same MBA+CFA that stated your auditor is U.S. based, thus 'under the control' of law enforcement authorities? I'll stick to my spiders, thank you!

0.0020.000(0.00%)Jul 27 9:34 AMEDT