Bush came in second place. And I agree that he was a bad president as well.
The pole also indicated that in hind sight that it would have been better had Romney won in 2012.
These are random poles, not Fox news.
I'm glad they stopped at WWII so that FDR would hot have been chosen.
I think people are finally starting to getting it that he is basically a seat warmer. And when he does do something he makes things worse, not better.
I'm sure that his recent actions that have opened the flood gates of illegal immigrants into the US didn't gain him a whole lot of favor among those whose jobs these new comers will be displacing. It does not take a whole of intelligence to have predicted that this would have been the outcome. I mean, you basically say that you are not going to send people home anymore and what would you have expected them to do? It is a good thing he didn't include everyone or half of the population south of the border would have been at the border with pick axes to tear down the fences. What a moron. They need to figure out a legal way to put a stop to this guy for the remainder of his term before he causes any more damage.
No, it actually didn't do that. It chose three republican Presidents (Reagan, Nixon, and W) as the worst since WW2. They split the vote and Obama was tops in a "plurality" (he's got rwnj's so scared of black people they simply forgot to vote for Carter). Just another reason, along with the 2000 Presidential election, why plural voting is a stupid means of deciding anything.
The fact that they block attempts to keep people from freely coming across the border pretty much tells you that all they care about is the new votes they will get without regard for the jobs that these people will displace. The jobs that their current constituents are working at, which apparently they could care less about because they are assuming they have their votes in the bag. And in so doing they reduce the demand for lower skilled worker and thus their wages. But hey, it is easier to get elected so who cares. You can raise minimum wages but that won't create new jobs, in fact it will reduce their number as companies would then have more motivation to automate. Also, since the low skilled work force is flooded with excess workers these workers will attempt to move to higher skilled jobs they would have never considered in the past and this drives down the wages of the next tier of workers.
No one can convince me that Democrat politicians don't understand this. They do. They understand exactly what they are doing. The simple fact is that they don't care. All they care about is votes, not the suffering that they cause to their constituents. Why? Because if they blame it on the Republicans their constituents have shown a propensity to believe them. So they don't have to care. They get their votes anyway.
All the policies that have lead to this situation the Republicans have fought against. During the campaign the Republicans were running on reigning in the Chinese by forcing them to float the Yuan and thus bring back US jobs once this corrects the trade imbalance. The Democrats yawned.
Granted the Republicans are not the ones to go to for freebies but they do care about jobs and the long term health of the economy. I am not even sure if the Democrats have that as a priority.