confirms efficacy of Lorc and states that he would never prescibe Qnexa under any circumstances. He is quite familiar with both drugs and feels that an approval from the FDA is warranted. This is all true as he is my brother.
Unsubstantiated information doesn't make it untrue it only makes it unsubstantiated. Like it or not even the National Enquirerer has truth within. This is a yahoo message board not the Wall Street Journal. Why can't observation and comments be accepted when stated as such?
GL Long ARNA
I like to believe you - what you say makes sense, HOWEVER, experience shows so much bogus and lies are posted on these msg boards that I need more than just some anonymous poster's words to believe this. Ok, I looked at your posting history and that didn't add anything to my confidence in you being genuine. Don't take it personally but I don't believe you as it stands.
If you're real you should have no problem posting his name if he's such a big shot, renowned internationally etc etc -- he hasn't said anything private to need to be anonymous about it.
I know this real fat dude and he said he would only take Lorc and no other drug due to possible complications
He's a friend of my brother, works at KFC
I do believe that if he had the chance to take Lorc he would wash it down with a regular coke, and a side of fries.
Sorry can't provide a link as none exists. However, He is a nationally (and internationally) recognized expert in his field and is familiar with these medications. He is also a private person who would never speak in a public forum regarding these issues.
The only link you need is the missing link that connects your brain to your spinal cord. The guy had a conversation. Whether you believe it or not are IMMATERIAL, because what he is telling you should have absolutely NO impact on why you are in the stock in the first place. You have either completed your own DD or you have not. It's as simple as that.