Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Oppenheimer Rochester High Yld Muni C Message Board

  • triever_blackcat triever_blackcat Dec 3, 2008 7:14 PM Flag

    It is driven partly by politics

    Additional comment below....It boils down to politics in my mind: This fund owns a ton of Tobacco bonds. These are the bonds that the trial lawyers sold to the public to monetize their winnings against the Tobacco companies. Basically, with the help of a Congress, and teaming up with various State governments, the Trial Lawyers ripped off the shareholders of Phillip Morris et. al., disguised by the fiction of helping the poor smoker. (Of course, the smoker also got ripped off since he is paying the judgment with higher cigarette prices, but who is keeping track.)

    *************

    Anyway, the Lawyers and their partners in the State governments did not get all the money up front. Their winnings pay out over 30 years or so. Knowing the companies would be ripe to second generation, third generation, and fourth generation legalized rip-offs (maybe by themselves, heh heh), they knew they had to get their money out, some how. So they took a haircut and sold bonds to the public to cash in 30 years of payouts immediately. Now the buyers of those bonds, you and I, are the "financiers" of the tobacco companies--since you and I own their bonds. So....we are the "new" purveyors of tobacco, the reasoning goes. So the next round of rip-offs will be against us, and of course hapless remaining shareholders of the tobacco company stocks and bonds.

    *************

    Now those are the main negatives. On the positive side, people tend to quit smoking slowly. And there is a lot of overseas demand for Marlboro, Winston, etc. So there is a ton of cash flow behind the bonds. I am not sure where these bonds stack up in seniority against the company's bonds, but they are ahead of preferred stock (if any) and are definitely ahead of common. So if you have even considered buying Altria or Phillip Morris common, you might want to buy this fund instead, since the payout is senior to the common. It might even be senior to the GO bonds of the companies themselves, though probably not any secured bonds.

    *************

    Unfortunately, with a Dem. president, 59 Dem senators and a Dem House, there is no telling what may happen to the financiers of the tobacco companies nowadays. Property rights of the owners of financial assets are now a bit squishy (especially for tobacco), so another round of confiscation is always possible.

    *************


    So this is a high risk fund. But hell, it is mostly muni tax free, and yields 10% so maybe it pays off. I bought 8% ago so I am already under water. But I will hang on and watch the politics--if it starts to look ugly, sell. Good luck.

    *************


    In addition, there are a lot of low rated revenue bonds that are not backed by the full faith and credit of states. But maybe Obama will bail them out.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • All the messages so far have mentioned how great this fund is due to tax advantages. Actually, states taxes are applied to this fund. In my opinion it is better to own individual state munis for double tax benefits.
      Anyway, I sold most of mine in '08 but I still have a decent chunk. Do you know if this fund will go under?
      Since I have a "commission based" advisor, I am in Class C. Do you know how much I am paying this company for expenses. I know that my advisor makes 1% on each dividend paid - and this company was late paying Dec. dividends by a week.
      Whether this muni fund has 30 year bonds or not, it's "accidentially" high dividend (as Cramer would say)is almost 12%. Almost sounds like a Madoff scam, doesn't it. According to Cramer, double digit dividends are too risky and when a stock price hits $5 and lower that is not good either.
      Thanks.

 
ORNCX
7.340.00(0.00%)Aug 26 6:45 PMEDT