There are new IDs showing up daily trying to warn people to stay away from GSS. And now I see a hatchet job in Seeking Alpha where some "analysts" warn people to stay away, but don't bother to mention if they (or anyone they advise) are short GSS. There sure are a lot of caring people out there. Why else would they post such "warnings"? It couldn't be that they want the share price to go down, could it?
There is nothing in that article that we dont know already. If the price of gold doesnt go up & stay up , gss isnt worth more than a $1. Hopefully it will cause the pps to go down briefly so we can all get some cheap shares
"There is nothing in that article that we don't know already."
B.S. That article is filled with a bunch of nonsense combined with some half-truths about GSS. You want examples? "The economy is improving." Really? For whom? Ask the millions who have given up looking for a job. "The price of gold is headed lower." Really? The lows from last June have held and gold has formed a bottom. Maybe if those lows are taken out, we can talk about gold heading lower. "GSS's costs at BP are $1,500/oz." Really? That's an old number and doesn't reflect current reality or where the numbers are headed as the company continues to cut costs.
Again I ask, why would a group of "analysts" just happen to write about a stock that isn't widely followed like GSS unless they or someone they are connected to have an interest in manipulating the share price?