Form 8-K for LOTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Dr. Ashley resigned as a member of the Board, effective immediately. In the Resignation Notice, Dr. Ashley claims, among other things, that the transparency, communication, and operations of the Company are in question.
"20 percent downside risk" bradford and fernando b.s. sorry but these f's make me really pi$$ed, because they pry on inocent investors...
these m.b's are full of scam bag f. faces.
anyways we know who is real...
to all else that post genuinly-thanks.
check the thread-nuf said.
got lucky on my W.A.G.
nice for next week.
so that board director was a good thing eh.
whole lota buying back at higher prices
and for the record the fernado and g.b. crew from i-hub - beware they are 2-face m.f*&^ing stock whores and they will post anything to make a buck - lying fz*&^heads-yea you fernando!
Just continued buying opportunities. It amazes me that the window for LTUS has remained open for so many months. I'll be adding to my position, if I get the chance to accumulate more below $0.97 again. Chance of a lifetime.
right on! exactly, so we are risk/reward junkies-eh...
gotta love it.
or leave as in yesterday.
this company at the turning point and appear imo to be doing the right stuff...
rev split and amex or nas on deck...
The reason these stocks present opportunities at these low P/Es is due to unknown transparency risk and inefficient mgt. The ones that successfully address these issues will see premium P/E expansions. The challenge is picking the ones that will get it right.
none of us know.
your opinion that it may, or may not be true, is right on.
My rule in cases where no one has data, or significant experience with the people or issue, is that my opinion is always best.
I think, he left and was unhappy, and left some vague wording (transparency, communications and operations..are in question) that can be true. Kind of like saying...chemicals are toxic...always true...can't say it isn't...but is relatively worthless to act on.
What person, or organization can you think of, that such vague representions do not apply to ?
He did tell the truth...just nothing of substance.
That's why they are trading at a PE < 3.
Had they done a better job to gain the common share holders trust, the stock would have traded at $4/share.
I try to approach it very cautiously, but systematically adding shares to my portfolio.
I think long term should be fine.
Bottom line, if the company is legit - the stock will trade 5 times in the next year or so.
I'm just hoping the latest retaining of Sichenzia Ross Friedman councelors for the purpose of up listing to AMEX or NASDAQ will finally put an end to all claims.