% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Wells Fargo & Company Message Board

  • bankauditorgus bankauditorgus Oct 31, 2012 3:11 PM Flag

    ... Well Fraudco QUIETLY BRIBES 10,000 "STEERED / SCREWED" mortgage customers with REFUND CHECKS / BRIBES with BIG CATCH that recipients who cash them CAN'T LATER SUE Wells Fraudco for MORTGAGE FRAUD ... !!!

    Wells Fargo quietly sends refunds to some mortgage customers

    Posted: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:47 pm

    Los Angeles Times

    Thousands of Wells Fargo & Co. home loan customers recently received a surprise in the mail: refund checks from the bank, along with letters saying they had paid unnecessary fees for their mortgages.

    The unsolicited offers of thousands of dollars arrived with a catch – if the borrowers cash the checks, they can’t later sue the bank, which is the No. 1 U.S. home lender. The San Francisco bank said in the letters that borrowers were put into more expensive loans when they could have qualified for cheaper ones.

    Analysts said the letters sent to potentially 10,000 Wells Fargo borrowers were a way for the bank to sidestep further litigation over “steering” customers into unfavorable loans – allegations that the government has made about certain Wells Fargo operations in the past.

    It’s one in a long series of legal troubles for major U.S. mortgage lenders. The five largest lenders in February to a $25 billion settlement of accusations that they “robo-signed” foreclosure affidavits and otherwise abused distressed borrowers. Mortgage investors have barraged them with lawsuits over defaulted loans, and the government also recently filed separate complaints against a number of banks – including Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp.

    “It sounds like they either found some problems themselves or the regulators discovered them and told them to get things fixed,” said Paul J. Miller, an analyst who follows Wells Fargo for Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co.

    Wells Fargo’s mailed refunds involve government-backed FHA mortgages made from 2009 through 2011. These loans are often made to borrowers with shaky credit or those who can’t come up with the 20 percent down payments required for conventional loans.

    Though they require as little as 3.5 percent down, the FHA loans are also more expensive because they require borrowers to pay steep insurance payments to protect against a default. But in this case, the borrowers actually had the down payments or home equity needed to get a conventional loan, bank officials said.

    Wells Fargo spokeswoman Vickee Adams said the problematic FHA loans turned up as the bank reviewed operations at two mortgage channels it has closed down: a subprime lending arm, Wells Fargo Financial, and a wholesale arm that made loans through independent brokers.

    The bank, which bought Wachovia Corp. in 2008, previously paid a combined $260 million to settle Federal Reserve and Justice Department allegations that its lending, pay and sales quota practices in the home-lending business caused borrowers to be placed into higher-cost mortgages. It didn’t admit wrongdoing.

    The loans were written as Wells Fargo surged to become the No. 1 originator of loans insured by the FHA. A bank mortgage spokesman said 528,000 Wells borrowers received FHA loans during the years 2009 through 2011, of which fewer than 2 percent, or 10,560, were offered refunds. He wouldn’t say exactly how many refunds the bank has offered.

    Mortgage professionals say banks often make more money packaging FHA loans into mortgage bonds than they do on traditional loans because of the government guarantee. And at the time in question, loan officers often made higher commissions on FHA loans.

    The refunds came to light when the Los Angeles Times obtained a copy of a letter. The bank never announced them publicly.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
48.12-0.20(-0.41%)Jul 25 4:00 PMEDT