That is an old myth, call your broker and they will set you straight on that. Shorts are not owners of the stock, longs are, shorts only borrow the stock from the longs, so if the long wants to sell their position the broker will force the short to cover, that is where the term short squeeze comes from. In the meantime a GTC Good Til Cancel order does not stop the stock from being shorted. A lack of actual available stock does prevent the stock from being shorted, like is the case with this stock.......It is HTB......Hard To Borrow because of the low float.
And I'm betting at many, or all other brokerages. Where do people get very low float stocks to short? They just like to hear themselves babble. And it's always the same posters that go from message board to message board with the same exact vomit.
Wherever they bash.......BUY that stock !
Bashed CPXX ALLLLLL the way UP !
Follow them right to the poorhouse, their permanent residence.
You'd think they would sooner or later learn.......not gonna happen!
I've seen these same BoZos on other boards vomiting the same garbage wherever they go.
Hey tradingEXPERT, so what you are saying is that a stock drops 7% and that is going to trigger margin calls ?
Care to explain that to us dummies ?
You love LYING ! Even Stevie Wonder can see that. Do you actually think you are fooling anybody for a split second ? You are one dumb SOB!
You call yourself tradingexpert but you are totally clueless on TA. This stock is doing EXACTLY what it is supposed to be doing right now in the formation of a BULLISH FLAG.
Instead of spending so much time moaning and groaning about every tick of the stock, educate yourself on a little TA.
" You really expect to find that kind of person from reading popular articles? "
Did I indicate in my post that I expect to find anything of value in reading popular articles written by MF or SA articles ?
The point I was trying to make is that many people seem to think just because MF or SA pay them to write for them that their word is gospel.
Any of us right here can "write" for them.
Simple as that.
Are nothing more than glorified message board "writers".
Anybody can be an "article" writer for them, and have their opinion just like here on this message board. Periodically if you do a search on them and find ads online that they are hiring "writers" for their articles.
Don't take my word for it.....look for yourself. There were ads online a while back for SA paying $20 an hour for article writers , and you do not have to leave your home, just like you do not have to leave your home to post right here on Yahoo.
One message board I was on a couple of years ago was an article writer for SA , and would tell us in advance what his article was going to be about, and take suggestions from posters on the Yahoo message board on things t write about.
Don't be snookered by these clowns.
Were you able to bash the stock down to your desired entry point ?
"It actually comes from the article you cited."
Would you mind cutting and pasting that here ? I'm too ignorant to see it for myself in the article that I cited.
"Eyegate switched treatment protocol in 2nd phase 3 trial".........Says who ?
Hey investissementcommone or smallpharma300 or whichever name you are posting with, where are you getting your information about any changing of anything ?
Mind sharing that here ?
Hey investissementcommoner sounds like they need somebody in there that knows "what they are doing".......that would be YOU.............right ?
A little story for you, I've been on blood pressure medication for quite awhile now, recently it wasn't working so good anymore, so my doctor increased my dosage, guess what...... now my blood pressure is greatly improved.
Imagine that ? So in your very talented opinion, what exactly is supposed to be done in a confirmation trial ?
investissementcommoner says......"I'm not just showing up. I've been posting on this dog for a while."
Interpretation of "a while" for investissementcommoner is..............since Feb 17, 2016, for a TOTAL now of 6 posts.
Yes sir we is a bunch of dummies.
Well since you do not believe in what the company is doing, why don't you get in touch with the AGENCY that does believe in what they are doing.........the F.D.A. ?
Why are you here trying to knock the stock down for a better entry point for yourself ? Go RIGHT to the F.D.A. !
Can you believably explain any other reason why you all of a sudden appear here bashing ?
Whoever is running their clinical trials is so disturbing to you that you are tossing and turning all night and can not sleep a wink ?
You really should relieve the pressure from yourself and go ahead and......fire them !
I'm curious, what price do you want back in ?
"data from the already completed phase III study will be sufficient to support the New Drug Application (NDA) filing"
Again: " already completed phase III study"
"According to the guidance, if the planned phase III study of EGP-437 in anterior uveitis meets the non-inferiority criteria, data from the already completed phase III study will be sufficient to support the New Drug Application (NDA) filing. The agency also added that the design of the planned phase III study on EGP-437 is acceptable and the nonclinical work completed to date is sufficient to support an NDA filing."