Jeffries is long millions of $s of srpt stock. Just google srpt top holders. The analyst served jeffries well! Ie they wanted to buy lower
His way of admitting etep AA has been granted? Ie he lost his little battle against etep. Surprised the stock not a little higher, not that it really matters. Still waiting on decision.....
Lol be careful, fda asked for Promovi data, look up promovi study and how many patients are in that study....
It was one of the most bizarre scientific hearings i have ever witnessed. I mean just think the implications of Woodcock etc showing up to babysit Farkas (keeping in mind she didnt show up for drisa adcom). I see only two reasons why she would show up 1) she knew Farkas was off the deep end and had to let him know she was monitoring him closely. But that is an extreme measure and if it was the case why did JW let the BDs go out in first place?? Which leads to 2) she was simply there to be PC and diffuse much of the advocates anger when the vote went against etep. Then she slightly surprised me when she basically seemed to instruct the panel to vote for AA so i was leaning back toward 1). But at the end of adcom they voted against both FA and AA so i decided heck i have no idea maybe it was 2) , ie she was just there to cushion the advocate outrage
But finally months later, if RF was pushed out, and it certainly appearst that way to me, it tells me it was scenario 1), ie JW was at the bizarre adcom to deal with a rogue reviewer- RF. I truly hope the Promovi data backs up AA and everything in this drawn out soap opera will (finally) make some sense....
The 2 mill bag of cash must have arrived on his porch from the shorts. Thank you very much. Why would he stay with the fda now?
If true great news but why should him leaving hold up etep AA announcement? Unless this is something that has really shook up the fda bigtime, ie something larger scale.....
Hope its true! Dont care if they got him for gross incompetence or securities fraud (ala hamburg) but that guy had to go, along with anyone else who blessed those BDs and the whole structure of the adcom
Thats good advice, but before i do, this is a binary event, you better bet on the correct horse. Ie not a bad idea to try to poke some holes in the cant fail theories out there! Lol
And you talk about pressure, you are the one that posts every single day berating the dnp. You sound VERY worried to me. If AA is guaranteed, what are you so ticked at dnp about?. Do you honestly believe they already finalized the decision and are purposely sitting on it, not announcing? The dpo or sdr theory makes sense. But if that process has already been set in motion, what does berating the dnp daily accomplish?
is it possible rhe fda is stalling and has not made the formal request for additional data to srpt yet? So again, you claim to know it all, you shoot down other theories, which leaves you with one theory. So pls answer, when is this AA announcement coming? It must be imminent correct? If no why not, according to your one conveniant theory?
What are you so worried about? What is wrong IF they are waiting for nore definitive data? More definitive data will probably lead to the best decision. I have nothing against bulls, its over the top pumpers i am not too impressed with. What does farkas and pumpers have in common? They are both way too biased
You make it sound like all these fda processes take geological time to play out. But what you gloss over is the fda, not always, but quite regularly manages to make decisions and finish these processes completely on time and before the pdufa date. What the heck is going on here, even if you assume dpo, and possibly sdr? Whatever it is its quite the elaborate "process"....
And what the permabulls wont admit to, is a very plausible theory- there is internal conflict within fda, and there was a SDR, and everyone ASSUMES the promovi D data resolved that SDR. But maybe it didnt. Maybe they are waiting for more definitive clinical data......well anyway, one thing is for certain, we keep waiting......
Youre the one who doesnt make any sense. If AA is the ONLY logical outcome, as you claim, sit back, pop the bubbly and enjoy. No need to wring your hands and troll the dnp
So if you are so confident that no ghosts exist and AA is a done deal, i assume 100% of your investment capital is in SRPT? I mean what better opportunity could possibly be out there? And if you have better investment opps, i hope you share them with us!
Keep in mind, srpt, while in a very strong uptrend, is still below levels where it was before Hideous BDs were released ( and i think we all can agree that its very possible the fda leaked details of those BDs ahead of time) . Is the current price (again below where it was before release of BDs) consistent with approval having been leaked from fda to major news outlet(s)?
So how confident are you that the fda has decided on AA? And that that anonymous author had a source within Fda? Care to quantify?
So if all the logic points beyond a definitive doubt to AA coming, when is the announcement? And if its not imminent, again based on all the incontrovertible logic, why is the announcement not imminent?
And lets face it grey, the entire market is making a mountain out of a mole hill, not just me. If we werent, and AA was as ironclad as you claim, and you now claim that someone within fda has LEAKED the AA decision and subsequent dpo, the stock would probably be between 40-55. Not 26. Not so easy and ironclad to explain that, is it? I mean if this leaked decision from within a source as solid as fda has reached a publication as prominent as the wsj, why arent investors investing in srpt in such a way that AA is guaranteed? Do you see that in option activity? I sure dont
And hopefully you see my point: his extreme bias toward drisa (even tho you think it was warranted) was part and parcel of his extreme bias against etep