% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Repligen Corporation Message Board

brawn412 448 posts  |  Last Activity: Feb 11, 2016 7:09 AM Member since: Jan 25, 2012
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • brawn412 brawn412 Feb 11, 2016 7:09 AM Flag

    Obama did his best to send the United states down a path to third world status. hopefully we have learned our lesson. Avoid Muslim Presidents who have a sociopathic hatred of the United States

  • Reply to

    India to smash solar power targets

    by markp1950 Jan 18, 2016 2:12 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Jan 19, 2016 5:46 AM Flag

    Please!!! This is nonsense. Capacity means nothing. With solar energy only 15% of capacity ever becomes energy. that is because the solar panels rarely function - especially at night

    So divide those capacity numbers by 7 and you will find that the amount of solar energy generated in India or anywhere else is next to nothing - worldwide 0.17% of all energy generated.

  • brawn412 by brawn412 Dec 1, 2015 5:43 AM Flag

    If BTU can survive the next 18 months they will resolve their liquidity issues by issuing equity - often known as dilution but it raises cash.

  • Reply to

    Global Cooling Update for Oct 15, 2015

    by railsnstocks Oct 15, 2015 4:11 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Oct 16, 2015 1:47 PM Flag

    thank you

    The global warming movement is being exposed as nothing more than a cult. Similar to Charlie Manson and his group of misfits

  • Reply to


    by zman9554 Aug 20, 2015 3:56 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Aug 21, 2015 8:49 AM Flag

    Don't know the answer. Maybe because it is below $5. Maybe some brokerage houses can short it but Ameritrade says ACI is not a candidate for shorting so I suppose BTU is not a candidate for shorting

  • Reply to


    by zman9554 Aug 20, 2015 3:56 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Aug 21, 2015 8:22 AM Flag

    Yes, it is short covering coupled with the fact that both ACI and BTU cannot be sold short. When the short covering ends we might have a pullback.

  • Reply to

    You poor deluded Warmers

    by tristrem Apr 26, 2015 6:54 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Apr 28, 2015 12:43 AM Flag

    Two things. Yes, temperature readings are being 'altered'. I live in Paraguay. We have and have always had accurate temperature readings. These accurate historical temperature readings show definite global cooling since the 1930's. However, the global warming frauds have 'adjusted' those accurate historical temperature readings to show slight global warming. A Completely fraudulent attempt to put lipstick on this pig known as global warming

    Second thing - anyone who regurgitates this nonsense that 97% of 'climate scientists' are in agreement with global warming needs to repeat the second grade - if they got that far. This number is as fraudulent as global warming itself. The real percentage of 'climate scientists' believing in global warming is the same as the percentage of the population believing in global warming - far less than 50%.

  • brawn412 brawn412 Apr 14, 2015 6:38 AM Flag

    The interesting thing is that it doesn't matter if RGEN makes or misses earnings or revenue estimates. RGEN is in favor and can do no wrong

    There is no correlation between RGEN's preformance, RGEN's business plan and RGEN's stock price.

  • brawn412 brawn412 Apr 12, 2015 1:54 AM Flag

    I don't know how this 0.31 EPS for 2015 keeps coming up. IT is from analysts. RGEN has predicted earnings of 0.25 to 0.30 ( 8-10 million net income) and that is with tax loss carry forward benefits. If RGEN paid a normal tax rate the EPS would be 0.15 to 0.25 EPS

    Also, hate to be a pessimist, but 0.46 EPS in 2016 appears to be a pipe dream. Again an analyst estimate but not very realistic considering that the medical supply business in slow and steady and considering that it is difficult to increase income by buying companies - companies that are making money are not cheap. Cheap companies are usually money losing dogs.

    Look, RGEN is a great company but positive sentiment about RGEN is becoming bizarre.

  • This is the one I had the most hopes for. The pancreatic imaging is basically worthless and the Freidrich's ataxia is never going to see the light of day.

    Thought Pfizer's SMA might have an outside chance but apparently not.

    Anyway, RGEN's core business remains slow, steady and solid.

  • Reply to

    The Problrem with Apple is

    by vivirenmiami Sep 26, 2014 6:26 AM
    brawn412 brawn412 Sep 26, 2014 6:44 AM Flag

    Right on vivir. I have had the same concerns. How long can AAPL survive with an idiot at the helm.

    I think the CEO should resign so he can spend all his time in the Church of Global Warming with all his mentally handicapped friends who believe in the same nonsense.

  • brawn412 brawn412 Aug 31, 2014 12:44 PM Flag


    You know I am a big fan of RGEN. Great management, loads of cash, no debt and increasing sales

    However, keep an eye on forward looking PE. This year it will be more than 60.. Next year also about 60. Assuming a share price of 20. Is a PE of 60 justified? Or is a PE closer to 20 or 30 or even 40 more reasonable.

    Anyway, great company with valuations that need to be taken into consideration.

  • brawn412 brawn412 Jul 22, 2014 4:42 PM Flag


    I don't think the shorts are driving ANR down. It is a terrible environment for coal. Met coal in oversupply and abundant and cheap natural gas.

    That being said, the met coal situation will correct and NG cannot be extracted at below cost forever. ANR has billions, maybe trillions of dollars in the ground, plenty of money and is burning very little cash.

    ANR will do well, but not this week or this month.

  • Reply to

    Have you heard?

    by ayscuew Jul 15, 2014 2:10 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Jul 15, 2014 5:43 PM Flag

    OK, fracking causes earthquakes. Fracking is poisoning water. Is this an issue. Maybe

    What we know without any doubt is that global warming/climate change is complete and total nonsense.

  • Reply to

    Man-Made Global Warming = BTU Below $10

    by mooseonaplane Jul 7, 2014 1:18 PM
    brawn412 brawn412 Jul 7, 2014 6:33 PM Flag

    I think you meant to say "Why fight the pseudo science and the hoax of Man-Made Global Warming"

  • brawn412 brawn412 Jul 5, 2014 8:07 AM Flag

    But solar energy is exploding. It is projected that within 20 years solar share of electricity will be 0.30%

  • According the the Pew Poll, which is pretty reputable, 53% of american either think that man made global warming is complete and total nonsense or that there is less than convincing evidence that man made global warming is happening

    Another 40% believe man made global warming is happening. 7% have no opinion

    . Nationwide, public health services are trying to identify those 40% who still believe in this global warming nonsense and place them in straight jackets to protect themselves from their own stupidity.

  • The EIA projects that the United states will increase power production by 20-30% by 2040. Coal use will decline from 40% to 30%, according to the EIA. The amount of coal used in 2040 will stay about the same as it is today.

    What will really happen

    1) Nuclear power which accounts for 20% of power today will decrease to about 15% with nuclear power plant shutdowns and few new nuclear plants. There are 100 nuclear plants in the United States. In 2013 and 2014 8-9 nuclear plants will shut down. Many more will shut down in the future. It takes 6-7 years to build a nuclear power plant. 4 or 5 are on the drawing boards but the earliest they will be operational in 2020 - if at all.

    2) Economical natural gas is neither cheap nor plentiful. 50% of all natural gas in the United States come from only 30 counties. The sweet spots where natural gas can be extracted economically are vanishlngly small. Natural gas is the future only if you want to pay an arm and a leg for it.

    3) Solar acounts for 0.4% of power production in the United states - 0.17% worldwide. If solar had a future we would have seen it by now.

    4) New Wind power projects are extinct since the subsidies for wind power no longer exist

    5) Hydroelectric power maxed out 50 years ago. there is no more in the United States

    What is going to replace decreasing nuclear power production and expensive natural gas. Maybe coal.

    Once it is generally accepted that C02 has no influence on climate or temperature and once we get this primate out of the White House coal will be doing the heavy lifting for power production.

  • 1) No implimentation until 2017 at the earliest. Probably much later with legal challenges and congressional distain for the plan

    2) Any president can eliminate it with a signature. Probably the first action the next Republican President will take

    3) By 2017 it will be obvious that global warming/climate change is complete and total nonsense.

  • brawn412 brawn412 May 30, 2014 6:27 AM Flag

    Yes sir, Georgie, solar now accounts for 0.17% of power production worldwide and 0.4% in the United States. Maybe someday solar will account for 0.20% of power production worldwide. That's amazing.

29.15Oct 20 4:00 PMEDT