To dismiss all professional bodies that determine excellence that opposes opinion is to be in a sea of ignorance. This is the world of the NeoLibertarian.
Lol, indeed. Not even an attempt to squirm out of your deceit.
"Over the last 30 years as gun ownership has increased, violent crimes have been halved"
Yes, this is an irrational comparison to claim causation I was talking about. You make this blunder, as well as the exact same error, because you have the superstructure required to be the climate dummy.
The extreme nature of your tangential argumentation compares well to the Juno spacecraft.
No, BLM shouldn't hunt down innocent people/police like terrorists. Thats why they don't. You want to hunt down the BLM movement for what they are and what they stand for. But you're too weak to do it by yourself. You need to plant false evidence to make your want for a lynching appear legitimate.
You again make irrational comparisons...no surprise there.
Also note the inevitable deceptive misrepresentation: "And murders where guns are involved is only 1/3rd the number of deaths by auto accidents", rather than deaths involving both guns and autos.
If asked for a rational assessment of that particular analogy, here is what this Liberal would present:
The significant advantages of cars warrants tolerating the adverse effects they generate. Guns appear not have a genuine use in civilian hands that justifies enduring the violence they cause.
Your response does not include DOJ tampering. FBI manipulation, false statements to the public and perjury, because of your love for misrepresentation and diversion.
You wouldn't be the climate dummy if you didn't.
"So help explain...."
Odd question, given no charges have been laid.
Surely what needs to be explained is how no charges were laid if, as you say, they needed to be. How do you reconcile this apparent conflicting scenario?
You obviously need to be spoon fed: the possible hypocrisy is that you're appear in denial about no charges being laid.
"It’s unclear to us what kinds of threats were used by the Obama Administration that caused her to back down."
Thats because you're an idiotic conspiracy theorist.
Federal courts (not Obama) struck down every provision of that law except Section 2b, for no other reason than it was inconsistent with federal law.
You don't see the difference between that one instance where hands were not kept in the air, and the many other similar instances involving black victims where full compliance was performed, because.....
"Peter Schiff’s father, Irving Schiff, was essentially killed in prison by the Feds."
Fantastic. There must be degrees of incorrectness? If so, this would be hard to beat.
btw, Irving Schiff was a tax cheater.
The stupidity of NeoLibertarians is highlighted by their ignorance of the fact that Ayn Rand was both wrong and a hypocrite, and more recently, the economic mess we WERE in was alleviated by the Federal Reserve.
"It is literally impossible to “make fools of ... goldbugs...”
Literally impossible? There is no such thing.
Related, is the fact that the literature clearly indicates the idiocy for a call to return to a gold standard.
How many innocent blacks are killed by cops?