No less than a sin that people continue to die when there is a tested and effective treat sent. A sin.
I have suspected, since 2010 which is when I first joined this board, that iluv is a disgruntled curmudgeon with a personal vendetta against the founder, Dan Borislow. Perhaps he was one of the shorts who lost a lot back back in the day when Mr. B taught them a lesson as CEO of Tel-save. Maybe iluv worked for Borislow at some point and was fired. His lurking about has always seemed to me to be the result of some personal bitterness. That is not to say that Borislow wasn't involved in some questionable actions, but iluv's harping always seemed to me to dredge up history that was irrelevant by the time he hauled it to the surface. What Mr. B did in 2010 was being repeated constantly for years after it ceased to be relevant. Finally, his moniker says enough about him to make me ever suspicious of this critical sensibilities.
"Not sure what a _____is," and "I understood that to be,...." and "that's how I interpret," and "I have a theory," and "I'm also not sure...." and "I get the impression...." Conjecture is your game and unsubstantiated theories are your claim.
Despite declining device sales, access right renewals will have a long tail and keep providing ample cash flow.
The overall VOIP market remains strong, and the company is likely to bounce back as management diversifies its offerings.
The stock is so cheap at 2x EBITDA, no home runs are needed. A mere single by management will cause the stock to pop significantly.
Our cash flow analysis shows the company could have upside of 70% or more to fair value even with pessimistic growth prospects.
This product is a profound blessing. So exciting to contemplate that this killer's stranglehold on so many is nearing an end. And a relief.
I had some audio issues. I don't think it is our computers. Furthermore, I have the same concerns you express here. I think the reaction to the query about their reluctance to be forthcoming was rude and creepy. Why can't they just acknowledge this shortcoming---at the very least? Still too opaque for my comfort.
Generally, I agree but there are pockets of business that are not govt owned....taxi service, for example, and, in limited numbers, eateries. I would not expect MJ to do a booming business there, but there is a tiny, burgeoning class who may be able to afford and appreciate MJ. One thing I just learned is that there is a privileged class (yeh, in "communist" Cuba which can afford MJ. They are the ones who recently enjoyed--much to my disgust--Chanel's latest fashion show there. You see, Karl Lagerfeld is inspired by the "richness of Cuban culture" and decided to exploit it. The hoi poloi were there. The masses were huddled behind the red tape.
Just because a country is fascist, doesn't mean it's communist. If you read Das Kapital, you would know that communism, as defined, is not fascistic. Unfortunate that Communism became defined by Soviet and everything that flowed from it. Let's just call Cuba a fascist remnant of Soviet Imperialism.
Nice to hear from others who loves the product. I got my first MJ appliance in 2009 and, having moved abroad since then, have found it invaluable. I've faxed over it too. Did that come in handy! At the time, I had few options living in the middle east.
In terms of the lawsuit, In my opinion, this is yet another bogus suit that will go nowhere. Tech companies are particularly vulnerable to them and MJ has endured one other a few years ago (maybe two over the last 5 years?) This too shall pass. This is a case for "ambulance-chasing" attorneys. Affect the price? Doubtful. The stock is at a new low and I envy you your chance to get in at this price. Perhaps wait until May 10th when you can listen to the conference call.
"I don't listen to anyone here." You and me, both. There are no longs selling at these levels. I too was investor in 2009 at a little over $1 not long before the merger.