Actually I am fairly conservative and disagree with many of the Democrat positions.
If the Republicans had put forward a candidate who wasn't a complete buffoon, and
who has zero political experience, and gets his knowledge of the world from watching
CNN by his own admission, and can't help engaging in 8th grade name calling,
I might have been with you. He is unelectable and would be frankly dangerous in a position
of great power.
Good point TX. Plus this deal at $13.50 might have been initiated and agreed upon before
the recent run up to $16.00.
Lets see...She is a lawyer...she was a US Senator.....she was Secretary of State....she was married to a US
President and had an inside perspective on world affecting decisions and no doubt even an influence upon same.
His credentials please?
Who do you want dealing with other world leaders?
There has never been anyone who has run for President that has been less qualified
Warren Harding, who many consider one of the worst Presidents in
history, was far more qualified than this guy Trump.
Trump has zero political experience, zero experience in dealing with world
leaders, is not very intelligent, can't speak in depth on any subject, offends half
the people he speaks with, and is in general a buffoon.
The fact that so many people in this country can't see this speaks volumes as to
unfortunately the # of idiots that make up the masses here.
Has nothing to do with left vs right. I'd be happy to support a good conservative Republican. The problem with Trump is he is an uneducated buffoon. Never seen anyone less qualified to lead a nation.
The first George Bush, who is of course a Republican has come out and said he has no choice but to
vote for Hilary, as have many other Republicans. Bottom line being that we can't have a buffoon running
our country. Pretty much as simple as that.
The spelling you want is lose....not loose.
Loose has a different meaning.....a relevant example being "has a screw loose"....
I saw that this morning on MSNBC......and I don't think Medivation has anything near as good as ADXS
Umm..we wait for it to come back up. Which of course it will. We don't sit around whining about every movement this stock makes. Do you have anything else to do with your days? Try getting out of the house a bit more. Maybe some fresh air will help.
But I do think we witnessed the elusive "short squeeze" spoken of immediately after the Amgen news
when we saw 8 million shares trade over two days. I think however those shorts who covered then re-established their short position after the big run up......which explains the large short position that remains today.
Since they are trading shares back and forth to themselves....in an attempt to free shares from others...
is there no limit to how far they can take this down?
I would say most of the shorts covered on the Amgen news. We saw it run fast to $16.00 remember....
on high volume. Then when it hit $16.00 expecting a pull back after a 100% increase......they shorted it again.
That is an explanation for the current maintained high short volume. 50% pull back from high
of $16.00 has us at $12.00. I don't see it going any lower. Hope not anyway.
OK. Thanks for the info. It's just that at the moment it looks green. Do you have that figured in...?