% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. Message Board

harehau 253 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 12, 2016 10:23 AM Member since: Oct 10, 2006
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to


    by harehau Jun 27, 2016 4:45 PM
    harehau harehau Jun 27, 2016 5:01 PM Flag

    Williams is worth $30 per share and will probably exceed ETE's performance over the next few years. And ETE has a debt problem with ETP. Will probably reduce their dist. You are clueless.

  • harehau by harehau Jun 28, 2016 2:48 PM Flag

    WPZ is up almost 7% today. WMB is WPZ. All we need now is the end of ETE deal and strengthening nat gas and oil. Best assets in the sector, now we need a new board.

  • harehau harehau Jun 16, 2016 7:53 PM Flag

    I don't think so, my calc is the return. But whatever. Why don't we just call a truce. These boards are supposed to be about small investors helping each other. And I appreciate lots of different opinions, and over time, my position may morph into something else because of someone's comment. I've owned WMB for over a decade, since the Enron days, and will own it for more years to come. ETE has been owned for 6 years, ETP longer. I don't trust Warren, I don't think what he has done is in the best interest of his owners or Williams. And I don't like what the Williams board has done. If the deal if forced, I will probably give it a couple of years and it could end up being a terrific investment. The time I traded KMP for EPD over a decade ago, which I regretted initially turned out to be a much better investment. I own many MLPs and will own them years from now. I was a supporter of the deal initially but don't anymore. Just state what you position is and why and we will all learn. You don't need to attack just because someone else has a different opinion.

  • harehau by harehau Jun 1, 2016 9:49 AM Flag

    Faber reports "sources", ETE/WMB not in talks about deal. Interesting that ETE traded down after the report. This will probably go to the court date, really don't think either side wants the court to determine the outcome.

  • Reply to

    The WMB Board wants you to vote yes

    by pjhatbpi Jun 9, 2016 9:57 AM
    harehau harehau Jun 9, 2016 3:48 PM Flag

    That's illogical, the deal is approved, Warren refuses to close and he probably has a good reason in the tax opinion and what damages are there. Still think voting no is best for WMB owners but is probably academic as the institutions will approve it. If Warren is forced to close, the merged co has $6 billion of add'l debt, not good for either side. Again the couple of dollars of premium evaporates.

  • harehau by harehau Jul 2, 2016 1:09 PM Flag

    Wouldn't be surprised if the activists try to garner support from others to make a run at ousting the board. The criticism of Armstrong, they've been on board since 14, curious they take no responsibility. Armstrong is ok, WMB has great assets in core areas. Speculating that this move could run the stock up even if they aren't successful. I wouldn't vote for them and would guess they would not have the influence anymore. Or they could partner with someone else? WMB needs to name a strong Chairman quickly and at least a couple of new directors. I believe the activists were not good for the co. With gas back to $3 and oil continuing to strengthen, activity should come back, 11 rigs up yesterday.

  • Reply to

    Looks bad for ETE's tax opinion argument.

    by oldtrader74 Jun 21, 2016 9:28 AM
    harehau harehau Jun 21, 2016 9:50 AM Flag

    That is a good question, this guy has been touted as tax guru of the MLP industry but it does seem they may have the right position. ETE is way too complicated, a reason to not merger, further complication.

  • Reply to

    Harehau, in my book, this was not a good day!!

    by pjhatbpi Jun 21, 2016 8:25 PM
    harehau harehau Jun 22, 2016 10:10 AM Flag

    pj, spread is 40%. I viewed yesterday as positive for WMB, I don't want the merger. I don't think WMB is trading based on long term value with the lawsuit, deal uncertainty. WMB has not really given us guidance and couldn't talk up their prospects standalone. Could be wrong, but think their prospects are fairly good with recovery of comm prices. WPZ coverage was 102% last quarter and prices have improved a bunch. Traveling for next couple of days so can't keep up with the machinations, and I've decided to hold for long term so not much to do but wait it out.

  • Still think a few years out, WMB will do very well, assets, Transco, will prevail.

    If the midstream industry were to see a wave of consolidation right now, companies including Spectra Energy Corp. and Enterprise Products Partners LP are in a better position to buy up assets, Thummel said.
    “You’ve got companies out there positioning themselves, or already positioned, that have a lower cost of capital than you do,” Thummel said.
    By abandoning the Williams deal over his financial concerns, Warren passed up on "the crown jewel" of U.S. gas pipelines, Thummel said, pointing at a map and making reference to the Transco pipeline. “If you asked Kelcy where he wished he was, he’s missing out on an opportunity right here.”

  • Reply to


    by harehau Jun 8, 2016 8:03 AM
    harehau harehau Jun 8, 2016 8:04 AM Flag

    Going to get a div reduction no matter which way the deal goes. The plot thickens.

  • harehau harehau Jun 3, 2016 2:24 PM Flag

    You truly don't have a clue about much of anything, everything they said is realistic and you should want the deal to be rejected, and it's what Warren has been saying. ETE will be much more valuable without the deal, as will WMB. I thought you said previously that WMB trying to force the merger was desperate. But we do appreciate the copy and pastes even if you only read the headlines.

  • Reply to

    All Stock Deal

    by wecsg7 Jun 1, 2016 11:11 AM
    harehau harehau Jun 2, 2016 4:09 PM Flag

    He is the sole owner of the general partner of ETE which owns the general partner of the LPs under it, and as such controls the assets of ETE and the LPs it owns. The merger didn't require a vote by owners since he has that control. ETE is a partnership and owners have limited control. An opp for abuse. He can pretty much do anything he wants to, consider the conv pref plan or paying his chief legal officer a multi $mm bonus to cover his margin call. There aren't the corporation safeguards that apply to partnerships. Buyer beware.

  • Reply to

    Natural Gas Price up 5% today 2.64

    by leggendd30 Jun 9, 2016 12:38 PM
    harehau harehau Jun 13, 2016 10:31 AM Flag

    Midstream cos undervalued, $$70 oil and $3.50 gas next year. More importantly 1.6% 10 yr T note, rates probably say low for few years.

  • harehau harehau Jun 3, 2016 5:11 PM Flag

    Like your id, fitting, lame. Even your attempts at humor are the same, lame.

  • Reply to

    See you in court, Bully

    by valueone206 Jun 16, 2016 9:22 AM
    harehau harehau Jun 16, 2016 11:49 AM Flag

    I own 5x more WMB than ETE, but you have the answer to everything. That kind of arrogance usually ends poorly. Cheers.

  • harehau harehau Jun 2, 2016 1:16 PM Flag

    My guess is this never gets to a vote, down to the wire, agreement to terminate or all equity, more probability for first outcome.

  • harehau harehau Jun 9, 2016 2:40 PM Flag

    The deal if I remember correctly, ETE did not make FTC changes a deal killer, they would accept the FTC ruling and close. Most were expecting this so no surprise.

  • Reply to

    I Plan to Vote Yes

    by jrkl88 Jun 3, 2016 5:28 PM
    harehau harehau Jun 3, 2016 6:03 PM Flag

    WMB owes something like $50mm for cash costs in deal max if voted down. I'm fairly bullish on WMB after they shed this deal. They will still have what Warren wanted, Transco and the NE assets.

  • Reply to


    by osborne6960 Jun 24, 2016 7:15 PM
    harehau harehau Jun 24, 2016 7:58 PM Flag

    Pj, this has been a mess, was just looking at the COB's background, I think we have a light weight board. If ETE had not come along, they would have merged WPZ, wasn't real wild about that with the tax hit, but WMB would probably be $40 today. Warren definitely out maneuvered them and got lucky but I didn't really want to be partnered with him. Would like to get the last move over and look at what their guidance is for the next couple of years, they do have things they can sell that are valuable. I do think they need a new board after this mess. I read a report that thinks the NGL demand will be so strong that the NE won't be able to keep up. The fundamentals look good.

  • Reply to


    by harehau Jun 28, 2016 2:48 PM
    harehau harehau Jun 29, 2016 12:04 PM Flag

    I agree completely. We need some guidance, agree that the div cut will be a good thing. I would expect a modest dip and recover to a new level after the guidance and cut. I don't things are nearly as bad as some imagine. WMB's issue is they have growth and they cost of equity is too high currently and the balance sheet is maxed out. Too much growth is a much better situation than no growth or a declining sector and too much debt. Believe somewhere in this mess, there were exploring the sale of Canada, a good business but not good synergy with rest of assets. ETE has the same problem, how do you grow ETP when the cost of equity is 10% plus. Do think part of the problem will be solved as comm prices come back and yields for MLPs drop as people realize the cash flows are still intact, WMB has 90% fee based rev, CHK should do a lot better next year at $3.50 gas, the bk risk is almost gone. The 10 yr T note at 1.4% vs an MLP with a 10% yield, that's a disconnect. You get WPZ back to maybe 5% growth and the current dist of $3.40 should be priced at 5% yield, that's a $68 unit price and WMB owns 60%. This is going to take a couple of years but a patient investor will be rewarded imo. And you have to have a bullish position for nat gas, I do.

26.63+0.04(+0.15%)12:14 PMEDT