Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. Message Board

jeff4iam4 22 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 8, 2016 5:04 PM Member since: Jun 29, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 8, 2016 5:04 PM Flag

    No, what is clueless is you and your bashing crew who either fail to be able to comprehend the written language or who just makes up lies about what others said and thinks anybody would not see through it. Wow! I mean it, wow! Talk about open and blatant lies and manipulation...wow.

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 8, 2016 10:18 AM Flag

    LC, you guys are describing getting nominated and voted onto the BOD. The issue CP (and myself) is staying once on the board. From what i read, it takes one vote to be retained. All this language you guys are russling up doesn't mention retention to the BOD, just on how to get on initially. Apples and oranges. Since you guys have the bylaws, please post the relevant parts instead of the part that had nothing to do with the point in the first place.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 7, 2016 4:10 PM Flag

    LC, as i explained to you, i do not have a copy. Also, i don't care if you believe it or not enough to spend hours trying to go through old iHub posts. Why not do your research on your own and find out what the bylaws are and prove CP wrong....which will prove your undoing, not his. As i explained before, i am not happy about the single vote rule and was highly disappointed when i read it. Why would i make this up when it doesn't benefit my long position in this stock....it actually is a warning sign that things are not set up to protect shareholders rights. But you go ahead and stick your head in the sand and deni the truth. I guess your ego won't bother to throw a bone to CP, even if what CP stated was actually found by others before him and he just mentioned the info in his post. By failing to gain knowledge, you end up ignorant.

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 7, 2016 2:41 PM Flag

    Unlike many here, i am always honest.

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 7, 2016 2:40 PM Flag

    It is not false. I have read the bylaws myself regarding this issue. Bungler i believe researched it and posted over a year ago. Sorry, but did not copy it, so i do not have it to post. But, i know what i read. I was very disappointed about it because it is a piece of #$%$ rule that gives too much power to certain individuals. But, it is what it is.

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 7, 2016 1:48 PM Flag

    You can have everybody vote against a bod member, but a single vote to retain and he stays. So, it really doesn't matter who else votes. Kind of stupid to even have a vote in that system....be better just to put in bylaws that BOD member is for life unless he resigns....sort of like a Supreme Court Justice.

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 7, 2016 1:42 PM Flag

    LC, the bylaws do state that a Board member is retained by a single vote. And since a BOD member gets a vote, they cannot be voted out if he casts a single vote for himself. A crooked system, but that is Delaware law. Anyhow, CPs statement is correct, so not sure why you ate calling him out on this subject.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 7, 2016 10:41 AM Flag

    Wow Nitwit, how old are you? That joke is a heck of a lot older than the movie " Dumb and Dumber". If anything, they ripped it off of public domain to use it in the movie. And ruining a joke is subjective and opinion...i think i was clear enough to get the punch line off enough to get a chuckle from a few. You must be very bored to have actually have bothered to try and trash my little post over something so trivial. Or do you still feel threatened by anything i write? Seems like you need to find some other activities to fill the empty time in your life, you know....those times when you just stare off in the distance while drool drips from the corner of your mouth.

  • Reply to

    End the misery

    by givemebackmemoney Jul 6, 2016 1:40 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jul 6, 2016 1:47 PM Flag

    There is always hope...unless you sell. Actually, things might get interesting pretty soon...maybe. You know, PPHM management knows they can no longer go it alone, and they cannot wait too long to make a deal. You just never know, one good deal and we could be golden...so hope we will cling to as we have nothing else to keep us afloat for too long....well, other than Avid and that is still 2 years out before that becomes profitable enough to sustain operations.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 1:21 PM Flag

    "And then,...and then,...along came Jones, slow walking Jones, slow talking Jones, tall, thin, lanky, low talking Jones"
    For any Ray Stevens fans out there....we could sure use a hero about now to pull us from this quicksand. BP, my hero!....a guy can hope....a guy can hope.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 11:48 AM Flag

    As for the science and manufacturing, I am still confident they will eventually bring this drug to market and it will become a cornerstone in fighting many diseases in humans. I also believe despite managements self-serving ways, they are also trying to bring this drug forward. They become hell of a lot richer getting this drug approved than they ever could by milking the company dry slowly over many years as many here believe is their purpose. That just is not true in my opinion.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 11:48 AM Flag

    As for the science and manufacturing, I am still confident they will eventually bring this drug to market and it will become a cornerstone in fighting many diseases in humans. I also believe despite managements self-serving ways, they are also trying to bring this drug forward. They become hell of a lot richer getting this drug approved than they ever could by milking the company dry slowly over many years as many here believe is their purpose. That just is not true in my opinion.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 24, 2016 11:45 AM Flag

    Dr.V,

    Read CP's latest response to you on IHub this morning. He makes interesting points (regarding the Bavi molecule being very large and thus creating a mushroom effect that would prevent all PS sites on a cell to be accessible. To be honest, as smart as I think I am, this one escaped me a bit as I was contemplating your point that there were just too many PS sites to attach on each cell. I still have a glimmer of respect for your knowledge of science, but it seems clear that this shows that even the smartest of people can miss a few things when reviewing other's work. The point is to find out as much information as possible....find the true facts and then determine what is really going on. of course, you still need to prove it works and admittedly, the trials have not been good to us...at least the chemo combos with the exception of the Phase 1 breast. Not that I am admitting that the NSCLC trials did not show Bavi works....they did...but the trial itself was not successful enough due to several circumstances to get FDA approval on their own. I am still on the side of the fence that Bavi works and will likely work well in I/O and the collaborations going on tell me a lot of other smart people see a lot of promise with Bavi as well. I suggest that you re-evaluate your position and quit telling other people that their research and opinions are hogwash compared to yours because you (and most everyone else) are not perfect and do not have all the information required to make a definitive statement as to whether Bavi works well or not. It could be they just need a little more work on figuring out the specifics on how to optimize it in use against human disease. I am giving them time. My only beef with PPHM is management and BOD related and their inability to communicate with shareholders and overcompensating themselves with salaries and bonuses even when things have not gone well.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 21, 2016 10:50 AM Flag

    And Vinman, to answer your question on the BLA, I agree with CP that they probably could submit it after they collect all data....but not sure that they will as the company stated that they have suspended all chemo/Bavi and will focus on Avid and the I/O combo collaborations. If they were to file a BLA, it would likely only happen if further data is gathered and if they felt there was enough there to possibly give them an advantage either in getting Bavi approved for Chemo combos or setting the stage for I/O combos in some way (safety for one). As I said before, I am on the wait and see side of the fence....well, I guess that means I am sitting on the fence trying to see where this is going. I will agree with some bashers here and say that IMO there may be a significant wauit before Bavi receives any kind of approval and thus Avid's success is key along with finding a partner for the I/O combos in order to keep the company going long term. I think they will be able to do it, but until they do, the stock price is going to remain dismal. I can wait...I invested long term in PPHM so there really isn't any change for me as I had not planned to sell any shares for several more years anyway. I have given up the dream of becoming filthy rich off of my 115,000 shares....but believe in the long run I can still do quite well. And again, I do not completely disagree with everything you said because my ego doesn't rule my thoughts as easily as some...I suggest you take a bite of humble pie once in awhile and open your mind to other possibilities rather than think you have all the answers when you really don't have much at all. There is no way with the information we have been given that you can systematically shoot down every single possible outcome other than what you have presented...you just don't know the full story....I doubt anyone does yet.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Question for Jeff

    by dr.vinmantoo Jun 20, 2016 7:20 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 21, 2016 10:40 AM Flag

    Thanks Wook, pretty much summed up what I was about to write "Vinman". He did twist CPs words a bit. Of course, his agenda almost requires him to because he needs to discredit people to push his real agenda, whatever that may be. And as far as his recent attack on MassH, totally off base and yeah, I don't think he has his eyes fully open to what MassH is trying to convey. I believe (in other words my opinion) that Vin is so caught up in trying to prove himself right and discrediting anybody who challenges his position about PPHM and Bavi that he automatically slants what is being said in the most negative light....to the point that yeah, he reads but refuses to understand there is a different point of view and it isn't necessarily wrong. My position that I have tried to get across to him is that he (and we) do not have all the data from the Sunrise trial and that we really have little to go on except filling in the pieces that fit what we think happed. He filled in the missing pieces by eliminating any possible outcome other than Bavi failed in the Sunrise and that is that. Others (myself included) believe that regardless of the trial not having the outcome we desired, it still worked as expected...and I do not think the company expected it not to work. However, we did not meet the standards for getting approval and likely were not going to meet them as the trial continued. And like MassH mentioned, why continue going down a path that wasn't going to really do much for your company when you can change course and continue down the new path being built by the industry. PPHM is not as dead as these guys would have us believe...and I for one am not happy with the BOD and management, but I also do not believe they are just scamming everyone with the goal of milking shareholders dry to line their own pockets.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Cloaks little brother, MassH, speaks!

    by learningcurve2020 Jun 20, 2016 12:42 PM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 20, 2016 1:12 PM Flag

    Not sure why you trash MassH, he is in the industry and avoids making predictions of the future. His info is clearly about processes that go on in getting a drug through trials,, marketing and manufacturing. But I suppose you bashers must leave no stone unturned to make sure everybody who does not follow your agenda is properly discredited, even if a person has actual great value like MassH. After all, there is money to be made in keeping the masses misinformed.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    1.00

    by jay_scott27 Jun 17, 2016 9:18 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 20, 2016 1:08 PM Flag

    Seriously? Considering this board is over run by bashers and about the only consistent long who posts anymore is the one you are bashing. There are only a few of us longs left who post occasionally...and I very rarely even rate posts....so what is your point? I can tell you that yes, almost every time a long posts, that post will receive almost all, if not all, negative ratings....because about the only ones who rate longs are the bashers. You really are a silly turd.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    1.00

    by jay_scott27 Jun 17, 2016 9:18 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 17, 2016 2:36 PM Flag

    Dr. V,

    Sorry, but although I am not at this point writing off your claims, I also do not agree with them either. There isn't enough information available to say whether you or CP are wrong. To make a statement that CP is a nut and doesn't know Jack is in my opinion so far off that it is laughable. I respect CP and he earned his reputation for respect better than you have in my eyes. He was the first to come out that the Phase 2 trial had been sabotaged by an employee and that has since pretty much been proven. Do I take everything CP writes as gospel?....no I gather all sources the use my own mind to decide what I believe is the truth. CP is a great source for information, so is Mass Hysteria, so was Freethemice....and even Goodjobhunting....among many others. I don't always agree with all of them, but I listen to them and constantly evaluate what they say and what I know and decide how to go forth. Hell, I even listen to your posts, negative as they are because you make challenging points that seem they could have some validity. The only trouble with your posts is that it does appear you have a deeper hidden agenda because you really ignore more than you present...but the part you always ignore are the possible points that indicate Bavi does work. It appears you have set your mind it doesn't and your agenda is to prove yourself right rather than finding the real truth. The proof of whether Bavi will work or not has not been proven by you or anyone else....we need more information....you do not have enough to make it a fact that it doesn't.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    1.00

    by jay_scott27 Jun 17, 2016 9:18 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 17, 2016 2:25 PM Flag

    LC,

    You miss my point. He clearly wrote "The AVID Production never produced anything then, and won't today.
    Or any time in the near future...". I don't know, but I thought I had a better than 1st grade education in reading English....because I interpret those letters he put in the form of a post to form sentences that basically state that Avid is not producing anything....that they are not creating biologic drugs in their facility. A huge number of sources (including pictures firsthand) that pretty much proves that is incorrect. If I made a error in a statement such as that, every single one of you bashers would be all over me talking about how big a #$%$ and a complete moron I am. How come he gets a free pass without a single word from you guys? A bit more interested in promoting your agenda than the truth? Yeah, that's the ticket!

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Vinny boy

    by coolhandlucy007_007 Jun 15, 2016 6:46 AM
    jeff4iam4 jeff4iam4 Jun 15, 2016 1:24 PM Flag

    Come on Bradley, get with the times! CA was dismissed....last week...or didn't you get the memo? Appellate Court confirmed original ruling. CA is over, only chance is taking this to the Supreme Court and they would not even consider looking at this bogus case...not even a 0.000000000000000000000001% chance.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

CLDX
3.50-0.28(-7.41%)Aug 24 4:00 PMEDT