% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

ONYX Pharmaceuticals, AŞ Message Board

mghmd 14 posts  |  Last Activity: Jun 30, 2016 3:36 PM Member since: Jan 22, 2000
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Just saw on Fly on the Wall that FDA is considering regulatory action for expert. Anyone know what is going on?

  • mghmd mghmd Jun 7, 2016 12:41 PM Flag

    I am long RLYP and considered buying more today, but decided to wai tillt the next sales numbers; I am willing to pay more just to be sure that the sales trajectory is ok. However, can't dismiss Berens since he is a five star analyst according to tip ranks; on the other hand, 4 other 5 star analysts reiterated a buy within last 11 days

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Once again, shorts control

    by beverlyhistory1 May 27, 2016 3:18 PM
    mghmd mghmd May 27, 2016 4:34 PM Flag

    What could be better news then ZS9 being crushed-virtually no one expected this. And RLYP only went up 9%! The shorts have to be at work. If Valtessa shows some improved monthly numbers, the stock deserves to soar. Perhaps some MDs deferred prescribing Valtessa BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT THAT THEY would wait till ZS9 became available; there is a fairly limited group of docs who have to deal with chronic hperkalemia and they are likely to be knknowgdable about this issue. In the end, all hinges on whether Valtessa sales improve

  • This has been described as potentially being better than Pacira's(PCRX)'s medication. Although early in development, it could be a big +. Any thoughts from the board?

  • mghmd mghmd Feb 17, 2016 11:23 PM Flag

    In my opinion as a hematologist, the induction RR is not overwhelming. Scads of studies have had slightly favorable RR, but failed on the more CRUCIAL criteria of OS.The key issue is whether the OS data, if +, will be really clinically meanigful, rather then just statistically significant. I own a little, but wouldn't bet the farm.,

  • Reply to

    Is there light at the end of the tunnel?

    by scientist206 Feb 9, 2016 1:02 PM
    mghmd mghmd Feb 11, 2016 12:01 PM Flag

    NEWTOWN, Pa., Dec. 07, 2015 (GLOBE
    NEWSWIRE) -- Onconova Therapeutics,
    Inc. (ONTX), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical
    company focused on discovering and
    developing novel products to treat cancer,
    today announced the enrollment of the first
    patient in the INSPIRE trial for IV rigosertib
    as a treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic
    syndromes (HR-MDS) after failure of
    hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy.
    "There is a significant unmet medical need
    in patients who have failed treatment with an HMA, the only available therapy for HRMDS,”
    said Dr. Guillermo Garcia-Manero, lead investigator for the INSPIRE trial and Chief
    of the Section of Myelodysplastic Syndromes at The University of Texas MD Anderson
    Cancer Center. “In previous clinical studies, rigosertib demonstrated positive results in
    HR-MDS patients with very poor prognosis. The INSPIRE trial is designed to assess the
    effects of IV rigosertib in these HR-MDS patients who have a short life-span and no effective
    therapies currently available.”
    The INSPIRE trial is a global, multi-center, randomized controlled study to assess the efficacy
    and safety of IV rigosertib in HR-MDS patients under 80 years of age who had progressed
    on, or failed to respond to, or relapse after previous treatment with HMAs. The
    trial will enroll approximately 225 patients randomized at a 2:1 ratio into two treatment
    arms: IV rigosertib plus Best Supportive Care versus Physician’s Choice plus Best Supportive
    Care. The primary endpoint of INSPIRE is overall survival and an interim analysis
    is anticipated.
    Clinical Trial Applications (CTAs) and/or site initiation activities for INSPIRE have begun in

  • Reply to

    Is there light at the end of the tunnel?

    by scientist206 Feb 9, 2016 1:02 PM
    mghmd mghmd Feb 11, 2016 11:56 AM Flag

    You have to be patient. The ph3 study, which has just started, for a "derisked" group of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome,, has a high likelihood of being successful. They have selected the group of patients who had the best response in ph2 for the ph3 study, and this is what I mean about being derisked. The study chairman is the head of the Myelodysplastic Section at MD Anderson, probably the best cancer hospital. and he spoke enthusiastically about the ph2 data after the presentation at ASH 2015.The company has strong support from Baxalta,,so I don't think you have to worry about bankruptcy.

  • article in SA today that rlyp has big advantage over Zy.. because it is free of sodium while Z adds a significant
    amount of sodium to a population of patients in whom it could have an adverse effect due to rise in BP. Can anyone provide an authoritative comment?

  • Reply to


    by tradingday33 Dec 8, 2015 11:37 AM
    mghmd mghmd Dec 9, 2015 9:55 AM Flag

    asa hematologist with40 years experience who bought the news, I'm buying more today

  • mghmd mghmd Dec 7, 2015 2:53 PM Flag

    I would listen to their presentation tonight before passing judgment. The whole biotech sector has tanked today, although I agree KPTI a little more then the rest of my holdings

  • The key point from FDA is that CVOT w\ill NOT be required for approval! Docs are highly likely to use this ORALl drug, whicht will have a much lower price then Praulent or Repatha off label for the larger market of primary prevention.

  • One of the greatest challenges in treating patients with AML is the very low white count which is almost always present; the low white count markedly increases the risk of sepsis. It is certainly no surprise that a further reduction in white blood count APPARENTLY caused by selinexor would lead to an increase in the incidence of sepsis. The numbers involved are very, and this may turn out to be a statistical fluke. In any case, it was very appropriate for KPTI tto reduce the dose, Keep in mind that the outlook for patients with AML, particularly, ederly patients, is very poor. There has been no significant improvement in the treatment for AML in over 30 years and there is clearly a very large unmet need. I don't believe that the reduction in seliexor dosage is a major problem in the development of the drug. The huge drop in the price of the stock appears to me to make it a compelling buy, which I have done. It is not uncommon for adjustment of dosage in phase 1/2 studies and this is the exact purpose for early phase trials. The huge unmet need for a new drug for AML is likely to make the FDA more willing to accept a drug with even small improvement of the outcome for patients with AML

  • Reply to

    Opinion of a hematologist

    by mghmd Jul 27, 2015 4:04 PM
    mghmd mghmd Jul 27, 2015 5:01 PM Flag

    Nothing imminent, but I am thinking about the stock for the long term

  • It is a shame that the FDA decided to make a "case" out of Valor. The entire study of all age groups just barely missed statical significance, and the benefit in pre-defined sub-groups patients 60 and patients with resistant disease or early relapse is quite clear. Personally, I see nothing wrong with pre-defined sub-group analysis. In fact, Novartis got approval for paninobast for multiple myeloma despite a negative review by the physician review panel. Nonetheless. what is done is done. However,I think it is highly likely that vosaroxin will be approved in the EU and Japan where this more consideration of the totality of resuts. EU and Japan are not an insignificant market. Vosaroxin is also being studied in the US by very prominent investigator initiated trials for front line therapy of AML and myelodysplastic syndrome. So there is still hope for a US approva in other indications then relpsed AML l. In addition, SNSS has a drug which looks pretty good as a pan Raf inhibitor for solid malignancies. Now at a market cap of $75 mil, I thin SNSS represents a good speculation.