Looking back over this post__I noticed spelling and punctuation errors (even for the lowered bar__of a msg board).
‘Macroenomics/Intrenational Finance’ sh/b ‘Macroeconomics/International Finance’
from those Echanges sh/b from those ‘Exchanges’. I failed on both the spelling and punctuation, since 'Exchanges' are a noun entity.
‘Moron’ chose to attempt to sh/b ‘Moron’ attempted to
I guess dr Chumps/flame and I have something in common after all__’thick keyboard fingers’. After all, some months ago, the ‘flame’ posted the exact same words as the he/she did under the dr chumps ID. When I called that out__via a reply post the he/she replied “thick fingers using copy and paste!” or something similar.
You have also continued to lose__you have been on the wrong side of every megatrend for now 4 years running. Again I offer you access to our classes__as long as u can leave your opinions in ur moron box at home!
When did I post that MORON? The bull did not end until after my "I am vindicated post". U urself posted a reply to that post "are you bearish now"?
I made money over those many months__U the premier loser lost!!
I had repeatedly posted on this the board “that the ‘Bull Run’” would not end until the “DAX” and “NASDAQ” past their all time His. Those indexes eclipsed those His almost in tandem. At that time__I posted here with title “I am vindicated”.
Throughout those many months___ a ‘Moron’ (dr. Chumps) posted 100s of times claiming/advising “guaranteed”__positions against this ‘MegaTrend’. The he/she was not only dead wrong__the he/she totally exposed his/her lack of ‘Macroenomics/Intrenational Finance’.
To my credit__over these many months I offered this he/she__access to my/our classes delivered at the Chicago Exchanges. Even though the he/she is only a METRA/CTA/PACE travel distant from those Echanges___the he/she has never chose ‘To Learn’.
Instead the ‘Moron’ chose to attempt to influence neophytes into throwing capital at his/her losing positions.
I travel to ChiRac routinely for my Exchange commitments. I only hope that the slaying of innocent lives migrate to wipe out he/she’s like chumps.
These are FACTs__and are not deniable!
I was never a part of the "CRUD crew'. I recognized doc reits as what he was. His purpose for posting was to drive volume/liquidity into his option postions. Kinda like a #$%$ like U!!
dr chumps is the same moronic poster using the flame IDs and most of these other ones on this board. Somehow the he/she/ gets off__on posting back and forth to hisself/herself. By the way the chumps never had an original investment idea__the he/she is an internet searcher that essentially co-ops other morons ideas (aka: Hussman/Prechter etc.) and reposts their thoughts as his/her own. Total loser!!
Go back to making ur "Dr Chumps" Id posts
The proper phrasing would be black communities_________are u 70 ish and from the South??
I was sitting on about +40% gain and sold a while back. It seems to me the BOD is not operating in the best interest of shareowners__been down that road b4 and have seen gains turn to a loss!
In Websters'__under the def for liar it says 'see Dr. Chumps; Hillary.'
Sorry but S&P just lowered CVXs credit outlook stating "We note that the company has significantly more debt than in the last cyclical downturn while oil and gas production are at similar levels."
Obviously you are the 'idiot'
Dude/gal__TBT is a leveraged inverse fund (and a poor one at that except for a swing trade). When the mkt tanks generally thre is a flight to quality (treasuries, a strong currency, sometimes gold). For example TLT a non-levered 20 yr plus Treasury ETP currently is up +1.45%, Swiss Franc +.94% and Gold +1.40%.
As safety goes are you referring to 'credit worthiness', the ability to pay the dividend or share price stability?
They would slash/eliminate the common dividend b4 the preferred. Keep in mind that as a 'fixed rate' instrument they exhibit 'negative convexity'. That means the share price will react more negatively (faster) to a rise in general/equivalent rates than a similar decrease.
All 3 are currently priced below 'par'. So it would seem some of this is already priced in.
You may want to look at 'RNP' a closed end fund (CEF) trading at approx. 16-17% below NAV. The distribution rate is quoted wrong by Yahoo. Since they commonly use leverage the dist is approx. 8.43%.
The High Yield market is reflecting the future defaults in weaker capitalized 'Natural Resource' sector companies. A number have already missed 'preferred dividends' and or slashed/eliminated common dividends to enable making debt and loan commitments. Some CEFs that specialize in this area have completed rights and preferred offerings in order to raise coin to step in distressed scenarios.
The natural resource bust combined with 'tax selling' have presented opportunities in these CEFs.