% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Message Board

notthatblind 47 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 13, 2016 7:29 AM Member since: May 17, 2015
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • I haven't received any information asking me to vote my shares after the first set I received. I was waiting until the last minute to see if they would be looking for more votes. It will be nice to receive that 1.28 shares for every DD share I own. Nice little bonus, wouldn't you say, Herr Zig and aliases?

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jul 12, 2016 7:18 AM Flag

    Nomo: Funfun and his immature aliases not_that_blind, el_paso_dunce, and ag_amenn_mon get their feelings hurt when you mention MON in a negative light....Just like his insane comparison to cigarettes yesterday, they will probably say those folks in Vietnam had a "choice" to be there. P.S. Did you notice that funfun is Terry on the new Yahoo board, and his aliases are all Chris?

  • Reply to

    why the recent sell off?

    by vietnamvet5 Jul 4, 2016 4:14 PM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jul 5, 2016 8:29 AM Flag

    Aren't you silly. DOW's CEO came to DD's CEO with hat in hand right after Breen took over as DD's leader, not vice versa. So DOW wasn't trying to "bail out" DD. You mention it yourself, the merger favors DD, not DOW. So why do you keep lying about DOW bailing out DD? How about a few facts to go with your trumped up opinions?

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 27, 2016 5:51 AM Flag

    Another alias of ag_amenn_mon, anti_ds_guy, el_paso_dunce. There is a pattern to their aliases. They are too stupid to create something without the xx_xx_xx pattern.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 24, 2016 12:47 PM Flag

    So much for facts. I knew you couldn't name anyone. If you can't back your posts up with facts, why bother making such a ridiculous claim? Your lack of credibility is showing. Paid operative? What a laughable statement. I am EMPLOYED by DD, not a paid representative of them. Although I will defend the company I work for when trash like you tries to misrepresent facts. At least I admit that I am employed by DD. You used to be a regular DuPonter, and now all you can do is whine and cry about anything related to the company. Carry on.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 24, 2016 8:31 AM Flag

    So, name some of these folks who in your own words stated "much of the best talent" has fled this crumbling company." What a grandiose statement. Bet you can't do it.

  • Reply to

    How can they call this a merger of equals?

    by pccbigboat Jun 16, 2016 2:30 PM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 18, 2016 9:26 AM Flag

    Probably should whine to your DOW board. It was Liviris and board who kept meeting with several companies for MONTHS trying to do a deal. If DOW was growing so much why was it that DOW CEO Liviris came to DD and not vice versa eager to do a deal. Your DOW CEO and board must have felt the need to do something, and the other anonymous companies mentioned in the proxy information we shareholders just received must not have offered a better deal. So now you can live with it, or sell it and move on. No use complaining about it, you still have time to ditch it if you aren't happy.

  • Reply to

    Mr. DuPont OptimumGAP Now Running Syngenta!

    by funfundvierzig Jun 17, 2016 6:13 AM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 17, 2016 10:56 PM Flag

    Dunce --- Its pretty obvious you aren't much of a man. Fantasizing about fat biker chick quick and easy and that exotic non Caucasian Darrilynn and this "wink" "wink" old fat lady instead of doing something with your wife on a Friday night speaks volumes. I'm sure she appreciates it though. She doesn't seem to be complaining about you being here 24/7.

  • Reply to

    Mr. DuPont OptimumGAP Now Running Syngenta!

    by funfundvierzig Jun 17, 2016 6:13 AM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 17, 2016 10:44 PM Flag

    I bet funfun loves how you litter his "important posts" with your fantasies of fat biker chick quick and easy and the exotic non Caucasian woman Darrilynn. It would almost be funny if it weren't so pathetic! Pepper balls? Sounds like a little too much info. Fantasize away. Wink, wink, how do you know I'm a woman? Maybe you are fantasizing about a balding hairy man. One can be anything they want here. Just ask funfun.

  • Reply to

    Mr. DuPont OptimumGAP Now Running Syngenta!

    by funfundvierzig Jun 17, 2016 6:13 AM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 17, 2016 6:38 PM Flag

    Doing bags? What is that? A reference to drugs or something? Nope. I was working today. I didn't see your imaginary pals Quick and Easy and the "wink, wink" man Darrilynn there. There's no Gables around here either. Just another well paid day of work for hard effort on my part.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 14, 2016 10:02 PM Flag

    I meant to say DD shareholders will have 1.28 shares of the merged company, instead of 1.24 shares. I'm glad I started adding to my DD holdings when the merger was proposed. It will increase my 401k nicely.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 12, 2016 8:24 AM Flag

    el_paso_dunce = funfundvierzig.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 11, 2016 6:06 PM Flag

    We think he didn't get a promotion when he worked for DD in the 1990's. Instead it went to a much more qualified woman. Then he was caught in the bathroom typing #$%$ about DD on his blackberry. The final straw was his insults towards women, minorities, sexual orientation, people with disabilities, and everything and everyone else including DD policies, bosses and co-workers. All one has to do is read through his thousands and thousands of hateful posts about the above mentioned topics to see why he was shown the exit. And every living minute since, he has used what is left of his miserable life to post non stop here, there and everywhere.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 11, 2016 9:07 AM Flag

    Don't beg. I've got no clue what you and your alias el_paso_dunce are babbling about incessantly. It sure makes funfundvierzig look intelligent for his two rabid followers to be spending all their spare time repeating the same nonsense several times---sometimes in the same thread. Sheply? Darrilyn? Beck? You are an idiot. No matter what alias you are using. And proving it with each post. Carry on, don't let me spoil your imagination.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 10, 2016 11:20 PM Flag

    Must be getting on funfundvierzig's aliases nerves. Still obsessing over this old fat lady with the same tired out old fantasies and make believe folks in each and every meaningless post. I'm really not the wet dream you obviously think I am from your multiple teen age boy style posts. Well, boy(s), try not to dream of me tonight when you are laying next to your obvious hag. Hopefully you aren't calling out my name in your sleep. Nighty night.

  • So, funfundvierzig, don't you wish you owned DD shares so you could get 1.24 shares of DOW for every DD share? Isn't that great news? Instead, the "superior" MON company you own once again rejected BAYRY, the only chance they had to salvage their Roundup this and Roundup that company, in my opinion. We'll see how quickly MON shares go back down if they don't allow BAYRY to buy them out. Even after all the speculative buying of MON stock when the proposal was announced, MON still couldn't get their market cap anywhere near DD. Or even take it near their high price from over a year ago. Boy does MON suck!

  • Reply to

    Stupid ex-regular DD employee simply lying!!!

    by notthatblind Jun 9, 2016 4:42 PM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 10, 2016 10:47 AM Flag

    It's nice to see that you have added imaginary names to your fantasies. Nice touch. Did your therapist suggest that? Too much obsession about this fat old lady might make your old hag jealous. Make it a good raving day here for all to see! Laughing AT you.

  • Reply to

    Stupid ex-regular DD employee simply lying!!!

    by notthatblind Jun 9, 2016 4:42 PM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 10, 2016 9:34 AM Flag

    Ha! Ha! You are one to talk about what belongs on the DD board. You and your aliases are just bent on bashing me with irrelevant and made up "facts". On the other hand, I am merely providing comparison facts when funfundvierzig bashes only DD for issues that other companies are experiencing. If he feels so vehemently about the water contamination, he should be talking about the whole picture, or he is merely lying when he keeps rehashing about the victims and how he is concerned for them. Why does he care ONLY about the DD Teflon issue and its victims, and not about the other companies' victims? I think we all know the reason. He isn't a regular ex-duponter for no reason. There was a major event that made him hate all things DD. But you just keep on posting your personal weak assaults about ME. It just shows what an immature idiot you truly are. You don't like that this old lady can get the best of you. Have a really good day. P.S. I am enjoying a well deserved paid vacation day from my employer, so my day will be great.

  • Reply to

    Stupid ex-regular DD employee simply lying!!!

    by notthatblind Jun 9, 2016 4:42 PM
    notthatblind notthatblind Jun 9, 2016 9:18 PM Flag

    Still more examples of 3M issues...
    Bilott was also one of the attorneys representing plaintiffs in Minnesota in a 2004 case against 3M that was very similar to the one in West Virginia. Both suits sought damages on behalf of the communities, and both argued that the companies knew the chemicals were toxic to animals and were accumulating in people and the environment.

    In Minnesota, however, Judge Mary Hannon determined that state law did not permit medical monitoring claims to be pursued in class-wide suits. So while the West Virginia suit yielded a $343 million settlement and led to the medical monitoring of tens of thousands of exposed people, which in turn allowed epidemiologists to find probable links between C8 and six diseases, the case in Minnesota on behalf of people who had PFCs in their wells involved no medical monitoring. Judge Hannon ruled that plaintiffs’ lawyers could not even mention the possibility that the chemicals posed any harm.

    “Because of that, the jury never got to hear why having that chemical in the water was bad,” said Bilott.

  • notthatblind notthatblind Jun 9, 2016 6:33 PM Flag

    Bravo...You have all your fake talking points and fake name dropping in the same rant. P.S. Who is Karen? What an idiot!!! I've really got you raving now!

70.24-0.13(-0.18%)Aug 25 4:00 PMEDT