% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.


ramoswyandotte 125 posts  |  Last Activity: Aug 15, 2015 8:03 AM Member since: May 24, 2008
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Cheapest bank in U.S.

    by analyst112 Jul 9, 2015 10:05 AM
    ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Aug 15, 2015 8:03 AM Flag

    Have owned CMOH, but just established a position in NWIN this week. For this kind of performance, it's just too cheap. Will be interested to see how that little mutual acquisition turns out. Regards, Ray

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte Oct 27, 2014 10:13 PM Flag

    Owned this one for several months. Just reported nice earnings. Anyone care to discuss? Ray

  • Reply to

    CMOH - Sweet little Ohio bank

    by ramoswyandotte Aug 30, 2014 1:14 PM
    ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Oct 7, 2014 6:41 PM Flag

    Understand the concern, but this is the same management team that capably guided the bank through the downturn six years ago. The bank lost ($300M) in 2007. In 2008, they sold a branch and pared expenses, resulting in a dramatic return to profitability. Since then, provision has dropped in every year and performance improved every year. LLR is a very healthy 1.6% of total loans. You can scoop it up for around book value, which I estimate is $27.75. In my opinion, this is a higher performing bank priced like a mediocre one. It's a little gem. Regards, Ray

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte Aug 30, 2014 1:14 PM Flag

    Bought an initial position several weeks ago, then made it a full-sized one this week after the dividend announcement. In my humble opinion, banks with this profile are especially solid investments in this environment. My basic parameters are sub book value, ROA = 1%, ROE 10%, rising dividends. This one fits pretty well. Regards, Ray

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Aug 16, 2014 3:04 PM Flag

    I agree. While buying back stock under book is a great use of capital, initiating even a modest dividend would also attract a whole new set of investors. Regards, Ray

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte Aug 12, 2014 7:15 PM Flag

    While I'm excited about the fine progress they have made in the year since the IPO, I'm a little perturbed that they didn't wait for the secondary until the first year's performance had been recognized in the stock price. Sigh! I guess the opportunity to buy buildings and float new stock is right now. But I'm feeling a mite bit diluted all the same. Regards, Ray

    Sentiment: Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte Aug 10, 2014 9:56 PM Flag

    I'm buying Exchange Bank enthusiastically under book value. The Doyle Trust owns the majority, but I'm happy to ride along. Paid back TARP, so I expect a substantial dividend increase. A feel good stock when the kids at the college benefit too. Regards, Ray

  • ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Aug 10, 2014 9:24 PM Flag

    Looks like a nice value. Just completed foray into Charlotte. Expanding footprint into Virginia later this year. Buying back shares under book value is a great idea. These mutual conversions sometimes require patience, but I'm with you. Ray

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    proxy and result out for Y2013

    by clownbucks Jun 12, 2014 12:53 AM
    ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Jul 27, 2014 2:49 PM Flag

    Wish I could have been there. There were probably only a couple of people outside the board in attendance. Farmers and Merchants Trust Co. opened its office in Torrance about two years ago. While the expense recognition is immediate, it will take longer for revenue from the South Bay to catch up. But Jeff Hahn / Connie Jensen are a good pair. At least the annual dividend is right around the corner? May your patience be rewarded, Ray

  • The day finally arrived. Great merger news with FCNCA. Congrats to all the patient longs!

  • Recently, I significantly expanded my position in LAACO. Based on the 48 self-storage properties they own alone, this company provides the opportunity to buy a decently-managed portfolio at 10x Funds From Operations (FFO), with competitors trading for much richer valuations--Public Storage and Cubesmart trading at about 22x and 19x FFO, respectively. However much I like the value of self-storage properties, the exciting thing about LAACO is their downtown Los Angeles real estate.

    Downtown revival is picking up steam as residential developers rush to build rental housing. In a car-obsessed culture, this caught everyone by surprise. In the last 14 years, the residential population in downtown L.A. has swelled from 19K to 52K, after a city ordinance allowed historic and underused properties to be converted into housing. Abandoned buildings have been transformed into luxury lofts.
    There are now about 14K apartment units in downtown Los Angeles, up about 3K in the last 5 years. About 5K units are under construction; over 1K within a 3 block radius of the L.A. Athletic Club. In my opinion, Carmel’s 700-unit residential building underway close by at W. 8th and S. Grand Avenue (completion scheduled for 3Q15) is pivotal, because it includes a 42K SF Whole Foods.

    LAACO owns three contiguous lots in downtown L.A. The footprint of each lot is 21K – 23K SF; altogether they are about an acre. From W. 7th on S. Olive there’s the L.A. Athletic Club / Hotel, 8 story parking garage and surface parking lot, ending at the alley. In October 2013, Mack Real Estate Group and AECOM Capital bought six acres (parking lots) in the South Park area of downtown for $82 million, or $12 million / acre, intending to construct 1.5K units. I believe that within the next five years, a developer will seek to acquire and redevelop the L.A. Athletic Club assemblage, retaining the club, but developing and building on the two adjoining lots. In my opinion, this is not priced into the units.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte May 23, 2014 8:58 PM Flag

    Nice piece of news yesterday: annual dividend announcement of $20, exceeding $10 last year. They paid $20 in total during 2012, but the second $10 at year end was more of a special one. This company is just continuing to impress me. The stock really caught a strong bid today. Regards, Ray

    Sentiment: Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte May 18, 2014 1:58 PM Flag

    Hello fellow shareholders. It’s Rip Van Winkle here. It’s time for my annual check-in. Warren Buffet once said that he buys stocks that he would like to hold if the market was shut down for ten years. Our bank is a candidate for the “sleep well” portfolio.

    After all this time, at $5,865 the stock had some nice appreciation in the past year, but it still trades at a $20 sliver below book value of $5,885. Now, the bank is expanding and investing in employees and technology. Just like it doesn’t care about quarterly results, but instead is building a solid franchise for the long-run. How refreshing!

    Nevertheless, I still wish they would buy back a few shares under their existing authorization this quarter before they issue the proxy. “Do you feel like we do?” (see Frampton Comes Alive!, circa 1976). Sometimes the best investment is in yourself, you know? Yawn! Regardless, I'm still holding and going back to sleep...

    Do you own due diligence,

    Sentiment: Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte May 18, 2014 9:15 AM Flag

    Here’s a hat tip to the McClain boys for a great first quarter. Wish I could be in OKC this week for the shareholder’s meeting to give a “hip-hip-hurray” in person. Looks like some Arkansas gas wells clapped out, but nice increase in oil volumes. Healthy boost in oil and gas prices received.

    There’s not a shred of pretense here. A simple, but strong balance sheet, with liquidity held largely in U.S. Treasuries. No dilutive executive stock options. No futures hedging. They are buying in stock for $180 / share again. Let the others chase the speculative offshore and shale plays. I’m happy right here.


    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Bought @ 7.70.....added @ 7.59....

    by keltus1952 Apr 11, 2014 1:43 AM
    ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Apr 13, 2014 12:08 PM Flag

    Sharing your disappointment. Tough to explain the recent underperformance. Fundamentals and management seem to be in place here. Wonder whether the market likes other issues better for monthly dividend and European exposure? Regards, Ray

  • ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Apr 13, 2014 11:20 AM Flag

    OK, got it that time. Nice looking yield. I will look for an opportunity to buy a share. I'm not a big fan of limited partnerships because I do my own taxes. But there are some opportunities that are worth the headaches, and this may be one of them. Thereafter, it may take awhile to research and fully understand, which gives the basis for expanding the position. Eventually, ownership + tact + persistence seems to bear fruit even with the most obscure issues. Thanks again, Ray

  • ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Apr 6, 2014 9:20 PM Flag

    Happy to help. This one is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. Any chance you would feel comfortable sharing last year's income and distributions?. On Schedule K-1, Box L, for income you would divide "Current Year increase (decrease)" by the number of units you hold. Similarly, you would divide "Withdrawals and distribtions" by the # of units. I might put in a bid if I knew those two things. Hard to enter a game when the blind bet is a $2,600 ante. Regards, Ray

  • Reply to

    Distribution raise to 15$

    by clownbucks Mar 1, 2014 7:39 PM
    ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Apr 6, 2014 7:35 PM Flag

    The company uploaded its statements to OTC Markets last week. When I first started following this company (before the Great Recession), units were trading around $1,500 range. In the scary year between February 2008 and 2009, you would need rappelling gear to successfully descend the cliff in the chart (over a 40% drop in the units).

    Operating income declined about 20% from peak of ~$16.6 million (peak – 2007) to ~ $13.3 million (trough 2011). So the weakness in operating income was not nearly as severe as the sellers of units presumably anticipated. Since the trough, operating income has trended higher, and it’s a reasonable proposition that it could return to pre-financial meltdown levels this year.

    At 48 self-storage properties, this company is not even mentioned in articles about the space (i.e. Public Storage, Cube Smart, Extra Space Storage, Sovran). PSA has 2,200 properties; the smallest is PS Business Parks at over 100. As group, the comparables trade for about 20 times funds from operations, at yields averaging 3.6%. By comparison, LAACZ trades at P/FFO

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Distribution raise to 15$

    by clownbucks Mar 1, 2014 7:39 PM
    ramoswyandotte ramoswyandotte Mar 8, 2014 1:22 PM Flag

    Although we didn't receive a $1 year-end boost to the final distribution in 2013 as in the past several years, I was pleased to see the 7.1% increase in the distribution from last quarter. In a month, we will receive the year end report for 2013. I expect to see the self storage properties continuing slow improvement in average leasing rates and occupancy. Southern California and Phoenix should be good, Las Vegas not so much.

    The ongoing renaissance in downtown Los Angeles has made the city favored by West Coast millenials for urban living, I'm increasingly intrigued by the redevelopment possibilities for the Los Angeles Athletic Club. The adjoining parking garage we own is positioned on a square-shaped lot, which means your car can climb quite a bit to find a spot, but it would support other purposes besides a 72 room boutique hotel.

    Our management has been great stewards of our capital, as past asset sales and redeployments indicate. With the low leverage and a supported 4.8% dividend yield, I do not suffer any insomnia owning these units. Hope your year is going well (Sometimes, I think that you and I might be the only ones on Yahoo message boards these days).


    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • ramoswyandotte by ramoswyandotte Mar 1, 2014 11:07 AM Flag

    Because of the first year since the IPO, I have not known what to anticipate with regard to information reporting. On Tuesday morning, the company reported favorable year end portfolio information. The stock marked time all day, and it wasn’t until the end of the week that REXR caught a much stronger bid.

    In full year 2012 and 9 months through September 2013, the company reported 194 and 172 lease renewals, with rental rates 1.6% and 1.0% below the expiring rent. The company cited uneven market conditions for the declines. In fourth quarter 2013, the 53 renewal leases had cash rates that were up 3.3% compared to ending cash rates. The 38 new leases had cash rents that were even higher at 4.5%.

    The company gave another welcome pieces of news. It said that its Same Property Portfolio occupancy increased 3.0% as of 4Q13 to 89.3%, when compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. Rexford continues to acquire new properties at a deliberate pace.

    By my reckoning, the weighted average cost of debt has dropped considerably. At December 31, 2012, Rexford had about $160 million in fixed rate debt, paying mostly in the 4.0% - 6.0% range. The IPO knocked that out, and any debt today is paying a floating rate around 2.0%. I fully acknowledge rate risk in a rising interest environment, but in the meantime there will be a dramatic drop in the interest expenses.

    Here's my thumbnail perspective on Rexford: a recovering Southern California market, rising rental rates, stronger occupancy figures, more properties to cover general and administrative expenses, lower financing costs and very seasoned management.

    Do your own diligence,

    Sentiment: Strong Buy