% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Aéropostale, Inc Message Board

rlee7794 4 posts  |  Last Activity: May 15, 2014 9:06 AM Member since: May 6, 2014
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Delayed Proxy

    by rlee7794 May 14, 2014 12:50 PM
    rlee7794 rlee7794 May 15, 2014 9:06 AM Flag

    Could be positive or negative. Or could mean nothing at all. But we're at the point that matches the latest the proxy has ever been filed (May 15 in 2006). Read my prior post on the un-executed Sycamore loan agreement. I imagine this is still unresolved which explains the delay in the proxy.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • rlee7794 by rlee7794 May 14, 2014 12:50 PM Flag

    Worth pointing out proxy materials haven't yet been filed with the SEC, stretching a little late relative to prior 10 yrs. Is something going on (be it good or bad)?

    Date when filed in prior years:
    2013: May 9
    2012: May 4
    2011: May 6
    2010: May 7
    2009: May 8
    2008: May 12
    2007: May 11
    2006: May 15
    2005: May 6
    2004: May 6

    Sentiment: Buy

  • rlee7794 rlee7794 May 9, 2014 4:25 PM Flag

    Just pointing out that that is meaningless. A declining stock w/ no institutional ownership turnover could arguably be negative, would imply no institutional 'buying power' left.

    I believe enough in leaky markets to fear that someone knows something - this stock is trading far too poorly especially in light of improving performance reported by competitors (Gap) - worst fear is the Sycamore loan commitment is not coming through and the company is doing an emergency PIPE to shore up finances through restructuring.

    Or alternatively, given the low liquidity, a top holder has taken the shares down in a desperate effort to clean up his/her portfolio and is price insensitive. Though I fear the former rather than the latter.

  • Felt compelled to chime in here.

    Sycamore purchased 8% of ARO last Sept for $54mm. At the time, The Deal reported "But unlike activist investors, who would push for changes at the company, Sycamore is ultimately looking to buy, someone close to the situation said."

    Yet the $150mm loan agreement announced 7 weeks ago has not yet been executed/signed. ARO said on Apr 30 "our transaction with Sycamore Partners continues to proceed as planned".

    Either one of two things are occurring:
    1) Sycamore is angling for a better deal (more warrants or a lower strike, or a higher rate on the $150mm loan). I don't see the investment as currently structured as worth Sycamore's time: their upside on 12% of the company and a home run would be a ~3x return which would be max $200mm. Not sure that's sweet enough for them.

    If this happens, this is obviously an incremental negative (near term) for public shareholders (dilution etc).

    2) Or Sycamore is negotiating a full buyout of ARO. Frankly this is what I prefer as a public shareholder and what makes more sense. Sycamore captures more of the margin upside from their sourcing agreement with MGF (The Deal: "According to industry sources, the deal with MGF is accretive to Aeropostale because it will cut the company's apparel production costs.") Also, Sycamore can likely negotiate more flexible lending terms (eg PIK) that ARO could not get as a standalone public company. Sycamore could make $1.5bn in home run scenario.

    ARO's results have been atrocious, recording over $100mm in negative EBITDA last yr. But liquidity position is OK - ended the fiscal yr with $100mm in net cash and a $230mm undrawn revolver. Run-rate savings from cost savings is $30-35mm, w/ $25-40mm cash expense this yr. After Q1, cash position will be down substantially, perhaps in the $35-45mm range (w/ the $230mm revolver still undrawn).

    Given just 2 yrs ago ARO was doing $150mm+ in EBITDA, the free cash potential is prodigious..
    Confused but optimistic.

    Sentiment: Buy

0.1510.000(0.00%)Apr 21 1:51 PMEDT