Yes that's right. That sort of thing has happened plenty of times with other small companies. They make the right moves and progress their business but investors, for whatever reason, have their doubts and the stock price just sits still or even goes down while waiting for some sort of confirmation. Then when a big company finally tenders an offer, boom the stock price shoots up and everyone suddenly has their eyes open and are asking "Why didn't I see this coming? Of course they have a great product." But then it's too late to buy. Don't miss this rocket ride because you never know when it will be. But I can understand everyone's frustration, including mine, because it seems like it will never happen. ADXS keeps getting positive trial results and ADXS keeps hiring new people. Geez, they're even building a manufacturing plant. That should tell you something. Does any company build a manufacturing plant if they don't feel they have a product that will sell? But the share price just doesn't move up and we blame Dan. I guess it's the old blame the quarterback thing. But Dan does need to make some moves to instill confidence and give us investors a reason to believe in him.
I can't believe all of this Dan smashing I'm seeing. Where were you guys when I suggested I didn't get the sense that Dan was was pushing fast/hard enuf? DeckHeightTwo was insulting me for my opinions and all I got was thumbs downs. Everyone praised Dan at the shareholders meeting. I'm not saying in the long run ADXS won't suceed with Dan. If ADXS has the great products we all believe that they do, then Dan should end up looking rosy in the end. But what I don't get is why don't we make a deal with a BP? We don't have to give up the farm, but we should take some risk off the table. By now shouldn't BP see that ADXS has a great promising product? Wouldn't BP be willing to take some risk too? BP can make an offer by themselves. They don't have to wait for ADXS to ask for a partnership. Where are our suitors?
AND, the death in our study was not even directly related to the drug. It was related to a prosthetic. Conversely, brain hemoraging is a serious thing. How can the hold be lifted after 5 days due to brain hemoraging?
The problem is that finance is all revamped. There is NO message board any more. And no option to go to the old message board. There is something new called "conversation". The only way I got here is by going thru my email and seeing someone replied to one of my old messages.
With the current CAR-T problem, it should make ADXS's technology more desirable for BP. With the way our stock price has been hammered down over the past year, now would be the perfect time for BP to come knocking on the door and trying to get a piece of the pie.
This has been a great discussion. I also agree there should be a partner. Why do it alone? We have a great product. Let someone else help pay for a benefit. This would have been an excellent topic to bring up at the recent investor's convention.
I can understand not liking them. I don't hold their views either. And they are completely wrong, imo, about this stock. But to wish death upon them and also to wish their family (and kids) suffers too is a bit too much. Bogus Weems may be evil but honestly, you wishing this upon him and his family makes you look evil too. Why not just wish it upon him alone? Why include his innocent kids? What is wrong with people on this message board, wishing bad things upon other people?
Well obviously you will never learn to be civil and write an intelligent arguement without name calling. (I could be clever like you and call you "Dickheight2inches" or something like that you know. Name calling is pretty easy to do.) I don't get where all your anger comes from. Do you really get that upset if someone disagrees with you? Haven't you learned in this world there will always be disagreement? So because I expressed an opinion (on a topic named something like "Give me your opinions") and you didn't like it, this upset you and caused you to call me names? You need a thicker skin. Really you do.
See, I told you that you couldn't make a post without name calling. Shows your lack of class. And I'll make my own decisions where I want to put my money, thank you very much. And what's with your comment about me manning up and taking responsibility for my own investment decisions? I do. I'm not blaming "manipulation" and I'm not blaming others for my decision to buy stock. So what the he1l are you talking about? Calling me an insecure adolescent is just way off base. Like I said before, your insults will get nowhere with me. Who made you the message board monitor? You're just a minion like the rest of us.
What's funny is that you think you can make anyone with an opinion different than yours shut up simply by name calling and insulting. Don't you realize that this message board is for EVERYONE to give their opinions? It's not just for those who agree with you. And your 3rd grade tactics of insulting people whom you disagree with is just childinsh. But hey, it's a free country. Do what you like. I challenge you to reply to someone you disagree with without any name calling or derogatory comments. I bet you can't.
No they won't. Shorts are gamblers and while some of them will cover, many of them won't be smart or lucky enough to cover in time.
I have never heard of Thalidomide before but it was an interesting read. I'm not sure that was a good example of rushing thru a drug because times and laws were different back then. It seemed to be more the case that we were much more ignorant back then and didn't have good FDA laws/rules set up yet. But in any case yes, I do understand the importance of safety, of course. And yes, it is a good example of a drug which was thought to be a wonder drug and turned out to have big problems. All the more reason for people invested here to have some caution and not just blindly praise this company (deckheightwo). A wise investor looks at all angles good and bad. My point of urgency is not just about pushing a drug along quickly for money, but rather because the drug can help save and prolong lives. We're talking about people who are DYING and don't have long to live anyway, not about expectant mothers. The sooner we get this drug on the market the more we help these people. Is that such a bad thing? )Deckheightwo)
You certainly would not make for a good teacher because (good) teachers encourage an open exchange of ideas by creating a positive non-critical environment. And they certainly don't approve of name calling. Just so you know, I'm a 56 year old man who has pretty much seen it all in life and your calling me stupid doesn't affect or persuade me in the least. So call me all the names you want, I don't care. It only reflects on you. And, if you had bothered to do any research you would know I am fully invested in ADXS, so why would I "soft bash"? I am only giving my view of the way I see this company operated. It's people like you who want to turn a blind eye out of ignorance. You want to smash any discenting opinions as if that will somehow help the company and its stock. All I said was that I didn't get a sense of urgency in the investor meeting. Is that a bash? It was the way I saw it. You're welcome to provide evidence that there was a sense of urgency if you like. Did you see a sense of urgency? I don't believe you did. So again I was right. This is the last time I will respond to you in this post topic because I don't like engaging with rude people like you who are closed minded.
We don't know each other and I don't remember having any rude exchanges with you before so I don't get the name calling and insulting comments. The title of this topic is "So thoughts anybody". I gave my thoughts. Does my opinion make you that upset? Perhaps I should have worded it better. When I said it convinced me the science is real, what I meant to say is it reinforced what I thought and was reassuring and educational. There, does that make you feel better now? And as for my comment on the sense of urgency, I stick to what I said because it is correct. Good companies (or should I say "most" good companies so as not to upset you again) have a sense of urgency to get their products on the market because they know every day they operate without customers buying their products is another day without revenue. You can't do that forever. One last comment to leave you with. It's better to encourage discussion on a "discussion" board than to insult others with different opinions. There are 2 paths: insult and ridicule and belittle people into changing their views, OR convince them to your side with facts. The 2nd way is so much better.
The presentation was persuasive enough to convince me that the science is real and that ADXS will eventually have good products, maybe the best. But what I didn't see that I would have liked to is there didn't/doesn't seem to be any sense of urgency. Good companies always have an urgency to get their products on the market asap. I didn't get that feeling during this presentation. The feeling I got was that management feels they have/will eventually have a great product so time is no factor.
Yes, that's the part of the presentation that impressed me the most too. People just don't have complete recoveries at that advanced stage. Just imagine how many CRs there will be when patients with cancer not as far advanced get treated.
What this series of posts shows is that obviously there is a lot of investor worry with this company and someone needs to make that clear to Dan. What better time than at an investor's conference.
This investor conference would be the perfect time for one of us small time investors to ask Dan straight out how can we keep up our spirits and optimism with the snail's pace ADXS is going. Let Dan know that it's tough remaining with a company forever and eventually investors move on to greener pastures. You know, let him know we want/need things to move faster and see more from our company.