% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Black Diamond, Inc. Message Board

starcutspin 643 posts  |  Last Activity: May 31, 2016 11:05 AM Member since: Nov 13, 2006
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • starcutspin starcutspin May 31, 2016 11:05 AM Flag

    They monetize what they can and get the money into insiders pockets before the doors are mercifully shut.
    Worst track record for longest period of time, ever.

  • Reply to

    When do we go out of business?

    by homer_jlow_simpson Apr 8, 2016 6:04 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin May 10, 2016 4:20 PM Flag

    "That is Paul Porter - the scarce skill resource". This is a joke, right? He was hailed as the second coming, and flopped. Besides, why would an honest person still be around and still let his name be associated with this travesty? Probably long gone. Like Arnie, RJ..........

  • starcutspin starcutspin Apr 29, 2016 8:25 AM Flag

    Makerbok merger was one of the worst decisions ever, and Brooklyn NY? You have to be kidding. There were probably tax advantages, but you have to have income for that to be useful. Hundreds of millions in write downs, and a raft of directors and officers came with it that add to the expense side. Seven of the nine board members looking to be reinstated brought this about (two independent candidates appear not to have played a role). No accountability for insiders. Send a message, seven ""no" votes..

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Apr 27, 2016 2:17 PM Flag

    Why are we seeing financials published for 2014, EJ and LEJU?

  • Reply to

    When do we go out of business?

    by homer_jlow_simpson Apr 8, 2016 6:04 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Apr 12, 2016 4:33 PM Flag

    Go back a few years and you will see there were about a dozen frequent posters pumping this stock like mad,
    then suddenly they all dried up and went away because they said they did not want to hear the doubters, but in reality it was just a couple of people with multi aliases. The whole thing has been a scam, and to answer your question, this ended a long time ago. So figure out whether to sell it and take the tax credit, or keep it and try to document that it is worthless. JMO.

  • Reply to


    by prentisscharlie Mar 14, 2016 12:26 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Mar 18, 2016 8:44 AM Flag

    1.1B shares. Does anyone doubt there will be an oversized reverse split? For those not protected from dilution (everybody here) it will race back down to pennies, a short bonanza. And oh, that $.25 floor some people imagine? What is the weighted average price he will pay for the shares (8 cents, 15 cents then 25 cents) and he does not have to buy from us and push the price up........we are providing his new shares through dilution.
    This is not a great deal for outsiders.

  • starcutspin starcutspin Mar 6, 2016 11:20 AM Flag

    They never give any details on the orders, for a good reason; they aren't worth squat, and management does not to want to be held accountable. Ever.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Mar 1, 2016 6:18 PM Flag

    It seems to me this is a one trick pony, one false step and its over. That is okay, but the musical chairs at the top says a lot. There is a management and BoD issue, and therefore as a publicly held company, reasonable doubt about who is looking after shareholder value. Outside shareholder value. Need to rethink risk/reward.
    If it is not at absolute minimum 20/1 mid term, time to bail.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Feb 23, 2016 6:09 PM Flag

    Obviously this is over. The engine never worked, but the cowards won't announce it. Nice work.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Jan 20, 2016 6:16 PM Flag

    Stemcells has just one thing going for it, for 24 years it has used the name Stemcells to attract naive investors, there is one born every minute. Over the that lifetime as a publicly held company, it has never produced a drug to market but has paid several CEO's and others very big money for failing. It is an historic joke.
    One of the worst biotechs for outside investors. RIP OFF.

  • Reply to


    by starcutspin Jan 19, 2016 6:29 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Jan 20, 2016 7:51 AM Flag

    Link please?

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Jan 19, 2016 6:29 PM Flag

    These idiots prematurely declared a reverse split with no rising fundamentals, in order to attract institutional investors, in total disregard of outside shareholders' best interests, this being a publicly held company. The BoD is to blame. Outside holders have as of now lost more than 50% of their money. Where are the institutional investors? Amateur night in Israel. Or worse. Might as well be a Chinese rip off or a Canadian mining company scam at this point. So the new CEO owns a lot of shares. So what. If they crash (as they have) the insiders will just issue themselves new subscription rights and the rest of us are washed out.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Jan 16, 2016 1:29 PM Flag

    Here is the problem. The shareprice has dropped 50% from the R/S price, and that is a fact. I would call it a crash, and the institutional investors have not shown up. It was a dead stupid idea at least for outside holders'
    sake. As of today, you lost half of your money as a result. Who is responsible, who is accountable? And where are the wise cracking blind pumpers that thought it was a great idea and shareholder value would go up? Gone or changed their alias. Stupid.

  • Reply to

    Todays CC

    by starcutspin Jan 11, 2016 4:45 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Jan 11, 2016 6:41 PM Flag

    stock-bouncer. Agreed. I bought Biogen at $7 a long time ago and it has split several times today worth
    $278 (I sold before that). My point is that Biogen has focused in on ALS and is looking at acquisitions
    in general due to the current price advantages in the Bio sector. If or when BCLI has a proven answer,
    it will be swept up in a heartbeat by somebody. In other words, today's price collapse on top of steadily declining value from the r/s suggests Brainstorm has not made the cut, and the shareholders are holding the bag. Maybe this will turn around, but the r/s did not attract institutional investors or any buyout interest. We just
    have less shares at a lower value.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Jan 11, 2016 4:45 PM Flag

    Feuers' article was a downer for sure, the CC really did not eviscerate the points he made but it was an unusual Q&A most of the "questions" were heartfelt anecdotal statements of support from people who had benefited from the procedure in some way. That is not going to do it, in any event, the shareprice dropped. Crashed, really. That reverse split was a very bad idea at the wrong time, lost almost half the value from the r/s price. Shareholders have been smacked hard.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Dec 30, 2015 1:55 PM Flag

    "several parties had expressed interest this year in working with REGI to develop prototypes that meet their future needs." Who are the several parties for confirmation?

  • Reply to


    by j_williams72 Dec 10, 2015 4:46 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Dec 17, 2015 3:22 PM Flag

    Of course it is year end bonus time, and the "independent" compensation committee is hard at work adding up
    all those hard earned performance bonuses and options so they can advise the full board on how much dilution will be required.

  • Reply to


    by thelion4495 Dec 11, 2015 9:08 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Dec 11, 2015 12:38 PM Flag

    Stop posting BS, that was planted to start a rumor. Show the link to a credible source.

  • Reply to

    Good or bad?

    by thebostonangler Dec 10, 2015 8:39 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Dec 11, 2015 7:55 AM Flag

    Well at best, whoever wrote the "embargo" notice is a neophyte, the company needs to explain that in detail rather than just confuse everyone but insiders.....or maybe they are confused as well.

  • Reply to

    Good or bad?

    by thebostonangler Dec 10, 2015 8:39 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Dec 10, 2015 1:58 PM Flag

    That is good information, but how certain are you this "embargo" is related to a biotech conference? If material information is being withheld from shareholders who were previously notified of a conference in December, that looks like a conflict of interest, What is the priority? Guess we will find out in January.

4.21-0.03(-0.71%)Jul 29 4:00 PMEDT