Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Inergy, L.P. Message Board

steveh8000 23 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 12, 2016 9:02 AM Member since: Aug 28, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    LETS TALK TURKEY

    by umadyf Jun 25, 2016 10:25 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 8:27 AM Flag

    A basket of crooks living large on our dime. If they run the share price up to unload more dilutive shares, I am out for good. It's doubtful they will get any FDA approval before going totally broke. Not certain if any buyout actually might happen within a year........who would want this burden on their balance sheet. It would have to go real cheap. Sadly, the new management has not given us any hope of a big pharma buyout, as they line their pockets.

  • Reply to

    As Usual___ No Sellers

    by exraps12 Jun 24, 2016 9:35 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 8:31 AM Flag

    Are you kidding me..........1000's want to sell, but not at a total loss. If $2.50 pps comes back on the radar screen, you will see a mass exit of retail cashing out. I will be at the front of the SELL line.

  • Reply to

    Belviq XR Due Out Before Next ER

    by c7_2014 May 10, 2016 6:41 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 8:38 AM Flag

    You folks are really stupid.......The weight loss sector is a BUSTED idea. The doctors are not embracing an expensive pill....ENUF SAID! Belviq XR will not make a difference to ARNA's bottom line. My hope the PR news release is really pumped up to raise the PPS via market makers who are in on the action. Be ready to exit if you want out as the share price increases. BELVIQ is a failed product.......just ask EASAI.

  • steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 8:42 AM Flag

    He is just reporting the facts......dilution so many times over their history goin back years.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • Reply to

    U N D E R V A L U E D +++ !!!

    by henriette888888 May 24, 2016 1:24 PM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 8:47 AM Flag

    70 thumbs down, 12 thumbs up ! 85% thinks you are a day dreaming fool who has no clue what a good investment looks like. You will be in your grave by the time they make a profit, or get any new drugs on the market actually making some revenue.

  • Reply to

    Has the New CEO

    by mistarichter Jun 24, 2016 3:50 PM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 8:53 AM Flag

    Market Price may be below $1.55 the way things are going.

  • Reply to

    Arena executives' telling behavior is

    by mrllerner Jun 26, 2016 12:29 PM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 12:46 PM Flag

    Over the past 7 years, when the exec's are quite with not much to say, it's usually been an omen of pending bad news in the near future. They have rarely pumped ARNA, and the forward guidance is non-existent for the last 2 years plus.

  • Reply to

    Belviq XR Due Out Before Next ER

    by c7_2014 May 10, 2016 6:41 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 12:52 PM Flag

    I am not sure if there is any planned marketing program to push Bel XR that might make a difference. Existing Scripts will most likely switch over, but we need new scripts from new patients. Will the price for once a day dosage result in the same incoming revenue?

  • Reply to

    Belviq XR Due Out Before Next ER

    by c7_2014 May 10, 2016 6:41 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jun 26, 2016 12:56 PM Flag

    I agree with you on that outcome....Wall Street is not stupid about ARNA's future. One advantage, it will cost less to produce Bel XR.

  • Reply to

    Strategic partners, or Acquisition

    by bioimmunomabman Jul 1, 2016 9:58 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 1, 2016 11:18 AM Flag

    This is a huge cut of employees, beyond what their core objective of the company is all about. If we see an external audit being conducted, then they are selling. The employee cut makes sense, admin people are going for sure along with most of the company. Bare bones prior to an acquisition is my view point. I was acquired twice in my career, employee cuts, dumping losing assets, not signing new leases, and then I was showing a Price Waterhouse guru all my regional retail store locations. We were bought within a few months into a joint partnership selling off 51% to the new owner, and keeping 49%.

    About time......if it goes private we lose value in PPS, the buyer only wants the good stuff, minimal staff, and pipeline. Mark this post, ARENA is going on the block in some manner before year end.

  • Reply to

    Strategic partners, or Acquisition

    by bioimmunomabman Jul 1, 2016 9:58 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 5, 2016 12:42 PM Flag

    I would be happy with a 51% sell off in a joint partnership relationship with ARENA keeping 49% of this mess. Substantial upfront operating cash to get through trials, give up rights to pipeline, keep a percentage of profits down the road, manufacture the drug in our pill mill.
    Their back is to the wall....I would take $4 pps for 51% if given the choice. Time will tell.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 5, 2016 12:51 PM Flag

    A fire sale maybe.....after the canned employees burn the joint down. Maybe they will give them some worthless stock options off the shelf stash as part of the severance package. Hee Hee. I hope Jim Stevens insider who worked at Arena keeps his job.

  • steveh8000 by steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 9:42 AM Flag

    My viewpoint....with the Panama Canal now open with more than double the capacity, the Florida sea ports are ripe for increased shipping traffic off and on loaded cargo. This is a big plus for CSX because they service each of the ports. Wildwood Florida, located in the mid central part of the state is one of their main rail switch terminals to direct traffic. 4000 aces of land is available to developed for warehouse distribution with the CSX tracks running right through the middle of it. The expected freight increase will come, and the county is making huge strides to build the distribution system for the future freight handling.

    CSX has a good potential to capture more than their share of revenue from the Panama Canal expansion. I think this is a good time to buy CSX at current prices. I owned it before and sold all early last year for a nice gain.
    What are our thoughts?

  • Reply to

    CSX and Panama Canal

    by steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 9:42 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 9:47 AM Flag

    I live in The Villages, Florida, located a few miles from the CSX switch yards and know for a fact the county is actively seeking this development project. Several years back 12 overpass rail bridges were raised to handle double stack freight loads by rail......that project is completed, and was long term project ahead of the canal expansion.

  • Reply to

    Investors should know about derailments

    by retiredcsx Jul 2, 2016 10:55 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 7:59 PM Flag

    I would worry more if I owned UP, they carry a lot of oil out west, and the enviro #$%$'s will fid some way to fine them for rail environmental impact from spills, fires etc Like you said, insurance foots the bill for most of the loss. Part of doing business.........liability insurance.

  • Reply to

    126 posts since April 25, 2016

    by phypan_99 Jul 10, 2016 8:38 PM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 8:08 PM Flag

    He might be right one or two post out of 127.....My post on the Panama canal expansion. He is dead wrong, Florida seaport shipping traffic will expand because of the increased canal freight. It takes a deep water port to handle the massive ships, and we have them, and CSX serves the ports. The entire state is gearing up to receive more imports.

  • steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 8:15 PM Flag

    I think you need to switch med's.......rambling babble is a sure sign your ready for a padded room. I hope you don't own a gun?

  • Reply to

    India will start to export coal

    by rift401 Jul 8, 2016 11:16 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 8:29 PM Flag

    You can bet I will come from Australia where India's richest Moguls own massive interest in coal mining. The coal in India is very low grade and very difficult to mine. They have been buying around the world for years, and will continue. Over the last four years India company's have been building coal export expansion shipping terminals on the east coast of Australia, with rail lines to feed the expected increase for quick loading.
    Do some homework before you make yourself look stupid again. These same company's will control a significant portion of the coal market. Bottom line, they can't depend on USA coal production thanks o the EPA, and O'b

  • Reply to

    Railroad vs Trucking

    by goldenretrieverman Jun 30, 2016 12:10 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 8:56 PM Flag

    Think no further.........freight transport cost per ton is what it's all about. You can run a train with 3 people on board, for the trucks it would take 100 or more trucks, with drivers taking longer to get there. Fact....rail shipping of oil/gas products are mandated to be a certain percentage by FEMA to protect the delivery supply of a critical national resource in case any major pipeline is blown up. One reason Warren Buffet bought Burlington Northern, he used his influence to get that mandate passed for national security of oil supplies.
    The system is rigged for the big players and it was a good thing. You can build a rail track much cheaper than a underground pipeline, and much faster. Trains don't sit in traffic, trucks do costing millions of freight labor $$ on a daily basis going at a crawl in traffic.

  • Reply to

    Railroad vs Trucking

    by goldenretrieverman Jun 30, 2016 12:10 AM
    steveh8000 steveh8000 Jul 11, 2016 9:01 PM Flag

    That's why we have FedEx and UPS, and rail hauls millions of freight containers later loaded onto a truck for local delivery. Each has it's place in the supply chain.