Four years from now. Expect Intel to still kick its rear end.
Missing the point as always.
"Fujitsu has signaled it will use 64-bit ARMv8 cores in the whopping exascale supercomputer it's building for Japan's boffins.
The Post-K machine is supposed to have 100 times more application performance than the K Supercomputer – which would make it a 1,000 PFLOPS beast – and is due to go live in 2020. The fastest known super in the world is China's 125.4 PFLOPS Sunway TaihuLight machine, which would be crushed by the Post‑K if it lives up to its performance hype."
Over on the reg.
From Bloomberg Technology
[Monk is sad. LOL ]
Why would I be sad? I am not a QCOM fan.
Intel will move to 5g and then sell into more.
But for now you are correct. Good point.
Most app processors now come with an embedded modem...Lets imagine Intel had a 5g modem today, who would they sell to?
Quallycommi and its internet backers like that clown at Motley are crying little bbbbtccchhhhhhes today.
Who can Intel win? Who else uses a stand alone modem that doesn't use their own?
Much has been accomplished to provide for many more people since then. What is the difference in world population since those times, 2000 fold (even higher?) since Dickens? since WWII 300 fold (even higher?)
Your numbers are very wrong.
1850, 1.2 billion
1940, 2.3 billion
2016, 7.4 billion.
FPGA's eh? So these billions of these devices that Intel is talking about will have FPGA's that only Intel can supply? Now much silicon will be needed for one of these IoT nodes?
What does an IoT device looks like. Is a PC one? A phone? A wifi enabled light bulb? Depending who you are talking to, they all are...
:) If you think I am a troll put be on ignore. As for DD, I can assure you, I know what I am talking about:)
"I am curious, what is this viable plan?" No your not,You appear to be the type of Person that argues for the sake of argument, you do your own due diligence, with the amount of RD $ has to spend you can bet your bottom dollar INTC will not miss the next big thing which IMO will be IOT.
Yes I am. Intel has presented a vision for IoT, but no strategy. Parts of that vision are very disjointed, and depending on what the IoT devices look like, Intel has already lost. Look at the billions it has spent on mobility and look where that went. Why will IoT be any different, given the similarities with mobile?
As for arguing, perhaps, but isn't that the point of this board?
[How can ARM compete in the IoT market if it can't even produce a competitive server?]
[How can ARM compete in the IoT market if it can't even produce a competitive PC?]
Perhaps you should read a little more about what Intel is saying about IoT. Tell me, will a IoT SoC look like a server SoC? Will it look like a PC SoC? Or will it look more like a smart phone SoC? Or, how about a microcontroller with comms?
[Citrix may wish it were so. But it's not. Only you would get so excited about fictions created in the marketing department.]
The problem Wallis, is this is an actual device. It's not fluff. I have no idea if they will sell 10 units or 10 million. I'm not a fan of the Citrix view of the client, and thankfully I've managed to avoid all implementations in my work.
You shouldn't worry about it Mr red I have put my money where my mouth is & so has INTC.& has a very viable plan in place & IMO will be in the IOT in a big way $$.
I am curious, what is this viable plan?
The quote is from "theregister." article written by Shaun Nichols. The SUBJECT line is theblueredmonk interpretation of "Tiny 'puters find a niche in virtual desktops" article title.
Actually the quote was from Citrix's blog. As for the subject, it was taken from a heading on the same blog, minus three words:
"The Business Desktop PC Is About to Be Displaced by a Pi"
Since INTC wants to be the IOT it won't matter IMO,INTCs days of total reliance on PC revenue has changed , you haven't been brought up to speed,INTC will be in Billions of devices at G5 LTE.
How can Intel compete in the IoT market if it can't even produce a competitive phone SoC?
[It's RT all over again. Why do you think the do-over is going to be any better?]
It's a Citrix client...Do you understand?
"Citrix has unveiled a desktop thin client based on the Raspberry Pi microcomputer. The HDX Ready Pi is a Citrix-built box containing the Raspberry Pi 3 hardware and a ViewSonic Linux build designed specifically to run with the Citrix HDX virtual desktop platform."
"In classic disruptive fashion, the Raspberry Pi has already taken a significant share of the education PC market with over 8 million devices shipped. With the Citrix-optimized HDX Ready Pi, we expect many other industries to adopt the platform, now that the “do it yourself” barrier is demolished. This device does not take the place of a mobile laptop or a high function thin client, but for the hundreds of millions of desktop PCs the HDX Ready Pi with a XenApp back end is worth evaluating for its compelling price and performance, before a standard PC refresh."
"Today in collaboration with TSMC, ARM's physical IP division is announcing the tapeout of a 10nm test chip demonstrating the company's readiness for the new manufacturing process."
Over on Anandtech, worth a read for anyone interested in tech.
Why because it gets INTCs foot in the mobile door in a very big way at the expense of a major player plus IMO validates their high priced new ex QCOM man.
The modem is just a 'part', it could be swapped out next year for another 'part', perhaps even an Apple designed modem right on the SoC...