Thig.. I love you like a brother but both people on the ticket are atrocious. HRC's public record is dismal at best.. and when you top that off with blatant, pathological Lying - she should not be do catcher. If she said honestly what her views are - no one would vote for her.
DT is an arrogant imbecile..who is good at what he does, whatever that is, however his ego is too big for the White House. If I had to vote for someone it would be DT, as HRC IMHO is beyond corrupt.
In short, America deserves much better.
I have been reading/posting on BB's for over two decades. I have read genius insight as well as misguided hyperbole.
I have never seen someone on the wrong side of reality and truth as much as you.
You need therapy, which is obvious to everyone.
Does everyone believe the 14M shorts covered @ $50+?
There is arrogance out there...dump trucks full of it.
This explains why we see dog feces like "investopediaphelia", "biostenchary" and the ilk...
Shorts got their just desserts.. covered with flies and they are all taking a bite.
SRPT deserved it, however the hard core komrade FDA'rs don't like that AA was granted or their minions who fled the agency to clip cash off the bio money tree.
We are one more solid PR away from driving a wooden stake through these vampires...
$225M is a LOT of money, while we know the PRV will bring in at least that much (speculating). Since Andover was purchased three years ago, adequate drug is on hand for sales for one year, I have to believe there are other intentions for this cash. I know the other exons are in trials and that is not cheap, what I do not know is how to do the math to figure out if this capital raise was to fund the other exon in trials - would help with my analysis and the specific intent of "what else" SRPT may be using this capital for.
I believe bacterial drug resistance is huge unmet need, screaming for a solution.
Chris.. if you are the real Chris.. thank you from a fellow 617'er. If we ever meet at a shareholder conference, the rounds of any 25 year scotch is on me.
how much faster could SRPT have gotten to this point of not for the tremendous pressure from the shorts?
..could they have raised more cash for a larger trial.. (made more drug as CG pointed out)?
This and other reasons is why I believe shorting a company like this, one that may save or improve a life, is utterly unethical.
Who is to judge what is snake oil..some sell side long/short analyst? Gimme a break. They are more often wrong than right.
I do not post from work..therefore I had to contain my glee.
I am happy that the shorts were decimated.
I am 100x more happy that these exon 51 kids now have a viable treatment.
In the end.. good trumped evil.
Evidently the DNP has some despicable people at the helm, who have a material negative effect on the lives of those suffering from horrible diseases. The DNP wanted to ignore FDASIA..it is time that they go.
You must be terrified...to the point of obsession. Seek professional help for your delusions and paranoia.
When the adcomm panel is referred to as "experts".. specifically DMD experts.. sorry, i know there were a few good doctors on the panel but the true Duchenne and dystrophin experts were a few feet away, watching them, mouths agape and shaking their heads.
Anyone who witnessed the SRPT adcomm knows it was a ridiculous, unprofessional, biased lynching, run by an incompetent DNP team.
Red.. I agree with you but I also think he has a few issues. The adcom was far to biased for me to believe it was a fair and open minded review.