Ok Tommy we have to preserve the record of you being an idioto but bevause you will Duh weet.
"tommystudley • 1 hour 23 minutes ago
And now that they lost the most recent Sandisk patent decision, that had everything to do with the 537, that's why no settlement, companies were waiting for that, now they will ask for reexamination and probably get it, could not care less they say its final , they will figure out a way around it...
Tommy Just in case you for get your post.
Tommy being an idiot again...1st off.... Netlist didnt lose the patent just several claims on the patent. 2nd off....the decision had nothing to do with '537 patent TOMMY....the case was all about '536 Patent. Once again you do not know what you are posting.....
Show me where I made a specific comment that the stock was going to that price on a specific day? And you will see a difference between "my" statement" and yours which says "YOU CAN BET IT WILL BE AT $ 1.18"
Lets talk only about what you "said" ok....You want to change the focus and start asking about unrelated subjects?? Is that your ploy? Once again, answer the question...You said it would be at $1.18 or less and it did not do that.
You sound like a desperate fool trying to make 1 last attempt to bash ......hahahah.... Go rotate on Pippy's micro kok
No he wasnt right......he talks so much negativity......that just because the stock goes down..... all of a sudden it makes him right? When it naturally will go down.....You dont understand the fact yet that when a stock has an exponential rise over a short period of time....it will return to its base range barring any sustained PR or earnings to propel it further??!! Your expectations are proof that you dont understand stock movements and your idea's are unreasonable. Todays price is actually Netlist new base of support for future prices movement. In other words....smart people will build their holdings from this support level. Unfortunately you are not one of them.
You dont get it do you? It doesnt matter where the share price.....this stock never has available shares to borrow...you do understand that right?? The shares need to be borrowed.....the shares that show being shorted are likely those by the market makers who have direct access to borrow shares. Otherwise if you are a retail buyer YOU will pay extreme premiums for the shares borrowed to you. The premium would be upwards of .50 or more per share.
You are a true idiot ...1 minute you agree there are no shares to short except for the market makers, and the next minute you seem to think that pippy can short these shares. Go ahead and try....
eniee... meniee... mynee...moe................Ok the 3 of you are here now where the 4th one Moe.....??? Oh you know...Pipster....the punk with the mohawk....
Yeah...this stock is tanking ...wow... I mean really tanking. Anyone know what the word oscillation means? Sure seems like that to me.... Do bashers understand UP and Down?
Probably understand going down more than anything....especially Jizm.