It's a good thing Trump is losing pretty bad. It could be worse than McCain lost in '08.
Because they care about making a point more than making money. I am 99% sure that point has something to do with the Illuminati.
I don't know if you have heard Boris Johnson speak, but he clearly is just making it up as he goes along. I would not describe him as someone who is grounded in reality.
They are all pretty much the same...
Cut tax revenue by 1 trillion dollars
increase military spending by 1 trillion dollars
cut spending to planned parenthood to save 600 million
build a wall that cost 2 billion
deport all 11 million illegals which will 100 billion
repeal Obamacare which will cost another 200 bilion
The notion that these people are fiscal conservatives is a complete joke. They all want to add to the deficit by over $2 trillion dollars. If this was 2011 all you right wing nut-jobs would be outrage, but its a new day to spend money you don't have.
It turns out the most fiscally responsible of the candidates is Hillary Clinton. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying she is going to balance the budget, but she is going to increase the deficit. Her plan is no major increase in miiltary spending, no major social program spending, and a marginal tax increase on the top 1%. Nothing earth shattering. If being a fiscal conservative was as hip today as is it was 2011, then the republican party would voting in droves for Hillary.
Globalization is not a trend that you can change. It is not a trend the government can change. I have an idea, Instead of wasting your time complaining like a little b****, Go get some skills to compete in a global economy.
Do you not remember the UN actively looking for WMD's and not finding them. Instead of taking them serious G-dub and the neocons just questioned their credibility and said we would go it alone. In the end The UN was vindicated and the neocons were morons with an itchy trigger finger that cost the US thousands of american lives and a trillion dollars. And now no republican will ever credibility on foreign policy again.
Hillary has the right idea to attack these companies with who are exhibit such naked greed. These are terrible human beings that take pleasure in profiting off of human suffering. But her plan isn't great. Where did the the $250 number come from? It sounds like the government would be subsidizing these companies even more.
My solution is to tie the drug's profit margin to the the length of the patent. The profit margin would be calculated by the all of the expenses that led up to company being able to sell that specific cost, including all the costs from the other failed drugs that the company researched. If a company keeps a reasonable profit margin, say 20% on the drug then they can keep the patent forever as long they can keep production high enough to meet demand. If a drug company wants a 100% profit margin then the patent would expire after 10 years, and competition would come in and drive the profit margin lower. If a company wanted a profit margin of 4000% then their patent would expire the following day, and competition would drive the price down.
I just used round numbers for argument sake, But the theory is sound.
I know the republican debate coverage make you think they have a shot in the general election. It is just an opportunity for all the republican candidates to say stupid stuff that will cost them in the general election. Seriously Hillary slaughters any and all of them in the general. Joe Biden slaughters them, even Bernie Sanders slaughters them.
And on the off chance the Hillary does says something monuemently stupid, and a republican upsets her The Democrats are on track to retake the senate. which will lead to a minimum of 2 more years of divided government. So I don't know how your non-politician is going to "shake things up" with in the confines of their constitution power. All I am saying is don't get your hopes up. All the republicans thought Mitt Romney was the best thing since sliced bread and he was a huge loser. Same thing.
How is CO2 removed from the atmosphere? Photosynthesis. Deforestation is causing the problem to snow ball. The carbon cycle is all out of balance. Before industrialization, the C02 naturally exhaled from your dead plants, from your breath, and from your cow farts was naturally absorbed by plant life through photosynthesis. Now humans are burning fossil fuels which AND destroying the vegetation that reprocesses it into breathable oxygen and glucose. Climate Change deniers are underestimating how fragile the ecosystem actually is.
I suppose you would like the EPA to disappear. They don't have the EPA in China and their air is so thick you can chew it. You want to be like China? Or do you want to preserve America the Beautiful?
I don't mind stupid people. Its people that are proud of being stupid that I don't like.
We are going to have listen to all of these politicians huff and puff about immigration and guess what happens 14 months from now? Minimum of another 2 years of divided government. Which means nothing will actually happen, no wall, no immigration reform, just more hot air being blown that waste everyone's time. That means everyone who is paying attention to this election coverage is wasting their time celebrity watching. Its akin to watching "Keeping With the Kardashians". The only difference is pompous old men who don't do anything as opposed to vapid young women who don't do anything.
part of the reason Obama got elected was that the american public didn't want to be in Iraq any more. It was decided by elections in 2006, 2008, and 2010. the nut jobs were just biding their time until the Americans left. Which Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld didn't even consider in 2003 when they started this whole unnecessary clusterf***. And another full scale invasion /occupation will have similar unintended consequences when you consider that the american public'a taste for war last about 5 minutes. You haven't proposed a solution. you are just b****ing and moaning and Obama.