See a pattern Warren? Do something Mr. Largest Position Holder!
Because there are some major bureaucratic hurdles with the Canadian government that will have to be jumped. At the end of the day, however, the bureaucrats and government leaders will relent, once they see that BBRY proprietary security systems will not be breached by ant foreign nations.
Objective is major buyout at $15-17/share in 2016.
I neither bought or sold. I already OWN 25,000 shares. However, as a shareholder, I believe an illegal activity took place that adversely affects all shareholders and traders. Reuters should be held accountable for reporting unconfirmed facts, and challenged as to what their motivation may have been? Something smells very fishy here! I spoke to a securities attorney and discussed this mater with the SEC, who aid they will investigate the Reuters story. However, I think that news organizations who report false news should be held accountable, and this means paying all shareholders money, and paying the government a fine, for its misrepresentations.
Reuters appears to have perpetrated a pump and dump strategy right at the close of market yesterday to benefit someone. This is illegal. Who would like to join me in a lawsuit against Reuters regarding their incorrect story of Samsung acquiring BBRY? I believe we could win over $100 million and perhaps some fine against Reuters?
Seriously? I have 3 $250k CDs; one of which matured on Jan 5. I doubled up on CNSL, and my cost basis is now 21.85. There are many of us wit large portfolios who post on BBs. I happen to like the hefty dividend the company is paying. Get it?