my gut feeling is right there with you due to every thing that has happened in the past several months has favored the shorts and crushed investors. now why would the briefing docs been released early on a friday into opex....then after snow delay and pps recovered somewhat but only 50% of what it lost would briefing docs be released with No questions and have the pps crushed again only to have the questions released the next day and phrased in a way that would most likely lead to a No answer....hmmmm multiple holes shot thru fda analysis major pressure by many parties and now a delay with no time frame given...now why not say we should know within the next 60 days and set a firm date...again sticks it to the longs imo....i have never seen another co get so manipulated by the fda as soon as they stand up get punched in the face come to their knees and get kicked in the chin then lying on the floor beaten with a stick...die already they say die...then farkas finds out woodcock will approve and he has a fit or so it seems, seems more personal than science imo.
i think you hurt his feelings...this board is for all opinions even those we do not favor. this may very well set a bad precedent but does not mean it will not happen given the political pressure being put on the fda. they may say hay its very safe we do see the boys walking and talking when they should be in wheel chairs or even dead, so lets give it a chance for the drug to prove itself while continuing the study and helping the boys
and those same loons never thought the vote for AA would be soooo close and to think how the questions were worded for NO. Had they been worded like any other bio this coulda been a yes easily. so howieshlong keep your short and pray its not approved or your doodywacker will get cut off
the way the pps is moving today. This could really put the squeeze on and panic some weak hand shorts...next week different story but this week its all about the GREEN Squeeze
no politics you kiddn me, lol...its ALL politics and huge pressure, the probably writing a limited AA given explicit details on what must be done and to make sure everything is covered.
I thing GREY nailed it said big shorts not covering due to the odds of AA less than a CRL or very very limited approval
i hope so Greyzone...i want them crushed, a little angry that the fda has played into their hands the past several months...we shall see
there has to be something a little off with folks that keep posting non stop and most likely have multiple IDs, why bother with that such a waste of time and effort like trying to manipulate the yahoo message board will effect the PPS...now that FUNNY...
I remember when i was in AMRN and they had several FDA approved facilities and the FDA still crushed them from $20 to 1s so to me even if the fda had inspected their facility would not mean anything to me...
News giving them a chance to cover instead of opening at $40 and spiking of $60 again they are given a chance to get out easy
lol...just put em on iggy like i did a while back and move on to posters that have substance, whether positive or negative gotta get both sides of the story to make an informed decision...i could name a few here but there are many on this board that know their stuff
yep and that will happen right after they throw hillary in jail for the bengazi and email racket...so now u know the rest of the story go back under ur rock
its a risk for sure and the pps could ramp to 30 and ill reap a nice gain...party not over until June 17 i still have a kazoo ready........
same here, had a nice gain on my 30s June Monthlies...stock up they down reason is IV was 1,000 which is insane and given the FDA stuck it to the longs again with NO date given who know if these dont expire without a decision or we need to roll out to Jan who knows its just another instance of the FDA sticking it to the longs, and its well documented, never seen it done so many times to one company.