Thu, Jul 31, 2014, 1:07 PM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 2 hrs 53 mins

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

VirnetX Holding Corp Message Board

aconfedercyofdunces 52 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 16, 2014 4:46 PM Member since: May 30, 2006
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 16, 2014 4:46 PM Flag

    DH
    I was not trying to say I knew when. I do think that there good reason to believe that P & C are in agreement so as to have a majority since a 3rd judge has not been assigned. Cannot say of course with certainty but seems that if one were going to be needed J Prost would have assigned by now? And I think she would like to clear all of J R's cases and have that behind her and put to bed. ? It is on these opinions ( mostly taken from RSA'a Seeking A article which I thought was well written) that it will not be too much longer. Certainly not the near the end of the year or next. !!! If one extends the pace currently being met, and knowing how many included JR then 2-3 weeks seems quite doable?
    But I am neither an attorney nor claim to be knowledgeable of the law, esp in this arena.

    Tick Tock

  • Reply to

    Volume

    by rstep17 Jul 16, 2014 12:14 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 16, 2014 4:29 PM Flag

    Quite frankly I do not know of one. Assuming as we, you and I, that there will not be any leaks, it is just a matter of time, which I think is growing very short. See the topic just above this one RE: the decisions being rendered of which JRR was one of the judges. Only a few left and by now I think it is safe to say that there will not be a 3rd judge needed as Judge Prost and Chen are in agreement, uphold or remand, and it is just the opinion that needs to be written or I would think more likely finished. Just my 2 cents.

    Tick Tock

    Sentiment: Buy

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 16, 2014 12:30 PM Flag

    ABSOLUTE RUBBISH

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 16, 2014 12:28 PM Flag

    Dec ….. Was about to post something on this a moment ago.
    FROM THE IV BOARD TODAY NOTE The last reply.
    ONLY 9 CASES LEFT FROM MARCH !!!! So cannot be that long from now, even if we are the Last.

    Tick Tock

    Reply #1 to msg #68812
    Msg # 68801 Posted 7/16/2014 11:09:25 AM by ming the merciless
    Recs: 37
    Not Today, But
    Another precedential opinion in Stoncor Group Inc. v Specialty Coatings with two judges sans the former Chief Judge Rader no longer participating in generating the opinion.

    Replies to this message Recs Date Posted
    # 68807 by Reverberator 14 7/16/2014 11:14:39 AM
    # 68812 by tivonomo 1 7/16/2014 11:25:16 AM

    This message is not part of the selected thread
    Msg # 68807 Posted 7/16/2014 11:14:39 AM by Reverberator
    Recs: 14

    Re: Not Today, But



    Likewise re In Re Patel decided today.

    This message is not part of the selected thread
    Msg # 68812 Posted 7/16/2014 11:25:16 AM by tivonomo
    Recs: 1
    Re: Not Today, But

    Now only 9 March cases left...

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Volume

    by rstep17 Jul 16, 2014 12:14 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 16, 2014 12:21 PM Flag

    I consider that possibility to be almost NIL. These are the brightest students that there are and not one to Risk ALL to leak sacrosanct information. Of course it happens in mergers and new FDA drug deals etc but IMO Not at this level of our courts. Call me naive but I do not believe there will be one iota of pre knowledge by anyone.

    Tick Tock

  • Reply to

    SA Article Shows The Power Of The Shorts

    by terp516 Jul 9, 2014 5:17 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 11, 2014 12:09 PM Flag

    Wineguy

    I agree with you. I am surprised that more people are not buying this stock. I know it is still a below the radar of most but .. Anything with Apple usually get some attention . An this does bother me some. Almost as if the old saying . "if it too good to be true……" Vanguard and Blackrock are the 2 largest financial listed. Do not see them picking up more. Should think they might esp if their base could be lowered. ? Folks keep saying that everyone is on the sidelines waiting for the Decision. I would think they would be IN as there should be Nice ## made on that alone. And they can hedge some too.
    The move up 10 days or so ago I thought was going to stick but NO .. Back down to $15 + …???????

    Tick Tock

    Sentiment: Buy

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jul 11, 2014 11:55 AM Flag

    Nice post and I hope Judge P is burning the midnight oil writing the opinion so we can move on to the next big Q.. What happens then.

    Tick Tock

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 19, 2014 8:41 PM Flag

    Also there is NO T ( despite you love of the letter T it seems) in the word CRUX. Just FYI.

  • Reply to

    So we are clear....

    by mcoulter2011 Jun 19, 2014 4:45 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 19, 2014 8:33 PM Flag

    Oops I am so sorry Thanks McC.. Excellent post and list. Think because Boris had posted a much shorter one it was him adding to it. My Mistake and that is 2 for the Day. Think I best not post for a bit. :)

    But again My Amends.. And Thanks

  • Reply to

    So we are clear....

    by mcoulter2011 Jun 19, 2014 4:45 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 19, 2014 8:30 PM Flag

    Boris You are a Beacon of Light. No Hyping, but rather the facts as they are..

    Seems you were gone for a while as I recall some saying Welcome Back. Well I concur 100% Please hang around. While everything you said above most here were aware of I do not think many ( not me) could have recalled all an put them so succinctly.

    Thanks so very much And you handle Mr T like a Sad Patient Father speaking to a mentally challenged child.:)

    Oh an you are Hilarious too. That guy who misspelled CAFC and your reply about the "Council Against Abused Chimps" had me rolling on the floor. Actually took me a nano second to get #$%$ you were talking about, then realized the mistake of the poster and Howled. Thanks for that one and several more.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 19, 2014 8:19 PM Flag

    1) I posted that it was a Mistake as soon as I realized. And said I was sorry.received an alert and opened it and saw VHC Upheld but Limits Yea I admit those were the words I SAW. Ok SHOOT ME.

    2) I do not spread FUD in anyway

    3) So chill a bit..

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 19, 2014 1:44 PM Flag

    MY AMENDS. I misread a New Release re: a S Ct ruling. Just My Mistake.

    Hate to have done this. Just not me.. And do not Hype a stock …

  • aconfedercyofdunces by aconfedercyofdunces Jun 19, 2014 1:35 PM Flag

    NO more details yet . Anyone Have PACER doc.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Soes not appear that they changed the minds of too many folks. Enough time I think for a move up if there was enough said to cause one. But no large drop either. Soooooo Maybe they just were able to stop the bleeding . Time will tell

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Update: The post was updated on June 15 to reflect comments made by Judge Rader in an email to the WSJ.



    An embattled federal appeals judge who gave up his leadership position on the court last month in the wake of an ethical controversy involving a lawyer who appeared before him will retire from the bench, according to a brief statement posted on the court’s website.

    Randall R. Rader, who served as chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington from 2010 until late last month, will leave his current post as judge on June 30, according to the statement.

    In an email, Judge Rader explained: “the bottom line is that I was NOT happy after vacating the Chief position and then awoke to realize that I should leave while I am YOUNG and brimming with enthusiasm about the prospects of improving world legal systems. . . .With that in mind, my plan for the future is to TEACH. . . .”

    In the past, Judge Rader has taught intellectual property at universities around the world. In his email, he said this would now be his primary pursuit. “In sum,” he said, “this is my chance to do what I love and I am going to seize it!”

    A spokesman for the court did not respond to an email seeking comment.

    Judge Rader’s resignation marks a coda to a situation that erupted last month involving a patent lawyer who argued frequently before the court.

    In March, Judge Rader sent a laudatory email to Edward Reines, a patent lawyer at Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP in Silicon Valley. The email described a recent conversation in which another judge purportedly told Judge Rader that Mr. Reines was “IMPRESSIVE in every way.” Judge Rader signed the note “Your friend for life, rrr.”

    Mr. Reines shared the email with a potential client, according to a person familiar with the matter. The email, which circulated to other lawyers, raised questions among lawyers in the patent bar because Mr. Reines had appeared before the court—a key venue in U.S. patent law—in prior cases.

    Mr. Reines did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.

    In a statement posted the day he stepped down as chief judge, Judge Rader said he regretted sending the email, adding that the email was “a breach of the ethical obligation not to lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of others.” He wrote: “I am truly sorry for the lapse and will work diligently to ensure that it does not recur.”

    The obligation cited by Judge Rader is included in a written code of conduct that governs U.S. judges. He was replaced as head of the 18-judge, Washington, D.C.-based court by a current judge, Sharon Prost.

    Judge Rader, a Nebraska native, was nominated to a seat on the Federal Circuit in 1990 by President George H.W. Bush, and became chief judge in 2010.

  • Reply to

    sfun

    by alwalters Jun 16, 2014 2:01 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 17, 2014 9:51 AM Flag

    Have seen many ER's and CC's that caused Drops at first then after the GUYS digested the PPS turned on a dime and whet up nicely .. Don't think SFUn held this CC to Confirm that their drop in PPS was justified !!!!! and everything is gloomy .. NOPE .. So we will wait a bit .

  • Reply to

    sfun

    by alwalters Jun 16, 2014 2:01 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 17, 2014 9:20 AM Flag

    I agree with all but so far pre market ( if an indicator at all ?) has gone from $9.35 to $9 in last 20 minutes We will see soon. And there could be a couple of hours for some to digest what is said.

  • Reply to

    Judges Still Laughing Too Hard To Write A Decision

    by terp516 Jun 13, 2014 12:38 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 13, 2014 1:15 PM Flag

    I personally like the 3rd definition of the word as it paints a nice image of YOU….

    driv·el
    ˈdrivəl/Submit
    noun
    1.
    silly nonsense.
    "don't talk such drivel!"
    synonyms: nonsense, twaddle, claptrap, balderdash, gibberish, rubbish, mumbo jumbo, garbage; More
    verb
    verb: drivel; 3rd person present: drivels; past tense: drivelled; past participle: drivelled; gerund or present participle: drivelling; past tense: driveled; past participle: driveled; gerund or present participle: driveling
    1.
    talk nonsense.
    "he was driveling on about the glory days"
    synonyms: talk nonsense, talk rubbish, babble, ramble, gibber, blather, prattle, gabble, waffle More
    2.
    archaic
    let saliva or mucus flow from the mouth or nose; dribble

  • Reply to

    Judges Still Laughing Too Hard To Write A Decision

    by terp516 Jun 13, 2014 12:38 PM
    aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 13, 2014 1:10 PM Flag

    I swore I would not ever reply to any of your. ??? (used all the words I can think of to describe your drivel) But your constant contention that ANYONE was laughing @ the VHC lawyers is just that. DRIVEL The Laughter heard was a result of J Rader poking fun at himself.. AND NOTHING MORE.

  • aconfedercyofdunces aconfedercyofdunces Jun 13, 2014 12:03 PM Flag

    DC I agree I posted these # a few days ago from a long term study done. The average for NP decisions would have been arrived as much as 40 days ago since the longest time for NP's was something like 60 DAYS!! Thus I do not think it to be that much of a stretch to anticipate a Precedential decision. And I do not think I (WE) are being overly optimistic in that belief. Though Judge R was listed as one of the slowest thus that maybe why we could go to the max time before receiving a decision.

    Tick Tock

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

VHC
14.026+0.006(+0.04%)1:04 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.