Thu, Feb 26, 2015, 7:05 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Metabolix, Inc. Message Board

akanz2 529 posts  |  Last Activity: 7 hours ago Member since: Feb 12, 2012
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    This is being pumped

    by bobobaginz Aug 26, 2014 6:57 PM
    akanz2 akanz2 Aug 26, 2014 10:48 PM Flag

    " reduced my position " ....say it ain't so .
    The run up today was because of the court docs filed by AZN in their effort to
    launch Epanova ....looks to me that they are in trouble as they infringe on Amarins patents for lowering TG's without raising LDL by more then 20 %

    Right now they (AZN) seem to be trying to steam roller over AMRN , but I don't think it will work unless they can find a flaw in Amarins patent.

    The main act ...FDA decision , is yet to occur ....I rate it at 70/30 in favor of Amarin I'm not selling
    But if you already have a profit ....well done

  • Reply to

    The move yesterday is based on IP strength...

    by williams4076 Aug 27, 2014 7:31 AM
    akanz2 akanz2 Aug 27, 2014 11:53 PM Flag

    Re Omethera
    Suspect they will push the 2gm version as an add on to Statins as a low cost way to reduce CV risk

  • Reply to


    by frenzychess Aug 26, 2014 11:47 PM
    akanz2 akanz2 Aug 28, 2014 12:01 AM Flag

    It 88% EPA ...regulated by the FDA as a food ...not as a drug ...if you CAN NOT get V with insurance coverage or otherwise afford it's worth considering .
    I have used it , but prefer , and can pay for , Vascepa

  • akanz2 akanz2 Aug 28, 2014 10:59 AM Flag

    I'm not Williams but the following info might help
    AZN is claiming that Omethera does not infringe on Amarins patent that covers an up to 20% raise in LDL on treatment .
    AZN claims that since Omethera increases LDL by about 20.5 % compared to baseline or placebo ( sorry forgot which one ) they dont infringe and thus can combine with Crestor if they wanted to
    However ..when compared to baseline or placebo ( forgot which one ) Omthera only raises LDL by about 16% ...thus would infringe on Amarins patent .
    Amarins patent is written to cover change from both placebo or baseline ...change has to be greater then 20% not to infringe

  • akanz2 akanz2 Aug 28, 2014 11:11 AM Flag


    From HDGator on Ihub
    Epanova increased LDL 15% relative to placebo and 26% relative to baseline arm
    Amarin's patent is written to cover both placebo and baseline ....thus they infringe .
    So unless they reformulate they may need Amarins patent to combine with Crestor

  • Reply to

    Amgen's PCSK9 Inhibitor

    by dendreonpro Aug 29, 2014 5:20 AM
    akanz2 akanz2 Aug 29, 2014 10:57 AM Flag

    Hi Den
    The PCSK9 is designed more for hetero familia hypercholestremia patients and those intolerant to Statins ...They do not directly compete with Vascepa
    PCSK9 's dramatically reduce LDL cholesterol ...hetero FH paints have LDL levels anywhere between 180 to I think about 500 ...over that its more likely to be a #$%$ FH diagnosis

    The drug will be expensive ..sub Q injection either every 2 or 4 weeks won't be damaging to Anchor , Reduce it
    JMO ( I have hetero FH and a Cardiologist and I did discuss my participating in Amgens trial ...but I dont like needles and would rather try and get my lipids in line with max dose Crestor and max dose Vascepa )

  • Reply to

    Amgen's PCSK9 Inhibitor

    by dendreonpro Aug 29, 2014 5:20 AM
    akanz2 akanz2 Aug 29, 2014 1:29 PM Flag

    Hi Kole
    Some what OT ... Those with Hetero FH who are also Statin intolerant face an unmet medical need . Without aggressive treatment as many as 85% of these patients will have a CV event by age 65 ( Medscape )
    PCSK9's will be targeted at this group IMHO
    Everyone with hetero FH should also be on Vascepa .... to reduce chance of coronary artery plaque rupture.
    Most patients with Hetero FH will likely have some amount of coronary artery plaque past age 40.
    Hetero FH is about one in 350 in the US.

  • Reply to

    I just ordered omegavia pure EPA capsules!

    by i_build_a_home Sep 1, 2014 10:53 AM
    akanz2 akanz2 Sep 1, 2014 8:00 PM Flag

    Build a home
    I agree that OmegiaVia Via EPA is the best alternative for those that can't get insurance coverage for Vascepa .
    Some patients using insurance co pays and Amarins coupon get a months supply of Vascepa for $19 ...OmegiaVia EPA will cost about $34 from Amazon including shipping for a months supply ....since it's 88% EPA you will actually need more of it to equal daily dose of Vascepa ....

    OmegiaVia Via EPA is regulated as a food ...Vascepa as a drug ...Quality and quantity of EPA is higher in Vascepa
    If you are getting OmegiaVia EPA delivered you will need to watch delivery times as the last thing you want is for it left out in the sun all afternoon . Vascepa I get from cold storage at Walgreens

    Bottom line ....If you have great insurance copay and Amarins coupon you don't even consider dietary supplement alternative .
    If your insurance declines coverage ...OmegiaVia EPA ..provides a lower cost , lower quality alternative

  • Reply to

    Just prescribed Vascepa

    by newheartissues Sep 1, 2014 3:21 PM
    akanz2 akanz2 Sep 1, 2014 8:13 PM Flag


    What insurance coverage do you have ?
    Are you using Amarins coupon
    What's your actual monthly cost ?
    Agree that your MD will want the quantity and quality of EPA to be consistent especially at 4 gm dose and if you are considered high risk .....what's your lipid panel numbers and family CV history

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 1, 2014 8:24 PM Flag

    IMHO ...Amarin will finish RI no matter what
    They currently have funds to last to early 2016 when an interim analysis is expected .
    I expect Vascepa's label to be expanded to include language that states that CV risk may be reduced by lowering high TG's using Vascepa in patients at high risk .
    Wider approval contingent on positive Reduce It read put.

    The reason for the change ....recent research in the New England Journal of Med identifying high TG's as a risk factor ....And .....probably over 30,000 patients now on V for over a year and no adverse events

  • Reply to

    Just prescribed Vascepa

    by newheartissues Sep 1, 2014 3:21 PM
    akanz2 akanz2 Sep 1, 2014 8:33 PM Flag

    I try an answer to that
    Did not pay for doctor visit ....he emailed in request
    Blood draw did cost me about $30
    No charge for lipid panel ....guess my insurance covers that.
    No doctor visit following discussion on results / review cost.
    Yes , did get a prescription
    Do not have extremely high TGs but do have a lipid disorder and a family history of heart disease on risk reward basis Cardiologist felt it was worth trying

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 1, 2014 8:46 PM Flag

    Hi Den
    Well full disclosure ...I thought 70/30 in favor of approval at Adcom ...based on risk / benefit analysis ....potential for benefit with almost 0 risk I was wrong there.

    If expanded label ... An immediate jump to at least 3 ....then the debate will begin on whether or not the Corscia group might convert some of their debt to equity which might involve diluting the stock ...

    I'm also wondering if the FDA may loosen their language on all RX fish oils we might see more competition from generic Lovaza.

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 3, 2014 12:27 AM Flag

    Thanks for that PS on low dose Statins
    JELIS was mostly medium dose of a medium strength Statin ...Simavastsin
    Most in Reduce it are on Lipitor or the strongest Statin, Crestor a strong enough dose to get their LDL below 100 to even qualify for Reduce it.

    The risk profile in Reduce it is similar to the high risk sub group in Jelis ...However I think the % still smoking was a lot higher in this JELIS sub group then in RI..

    In effect have twice the dose of EPA with twice the dose of Statin in Reduce IT vs JELIS.
    Be happy if you just see the dramatic drop in CV events in those that have high TG's and low HDL profile in both trials ...I know I will be ..thats my lipid profile :)

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 3, 2014 12:41 AM Flag

    Re FDA terminating clinical trials ......this is a cardio vascular Outcome trial ...NOT a cancer trial with some experimental drug .
    Fish oils and fish , have been around , and eaten ..since who knows when.
    "excessive deaths " WILL NOT be caused by Vascepa as a reason to terminate the trial ...neither will the placebo or the statin used
    NONE of them will cause excessive deaths ...the question will be whether Vascepa added to Statins is better then Statin and placebo.

  • Reply to

    I just ordered omegavia pure EPA capsules!

    by i_build_a_home Sep 1, 2014 10:53 AM
    akanz2 akanz2 Sep 3, 2014 11:17 AM Flag

    There are some good things to say about Omegia Via EPA ...but unfortunately you dont seem to know what they are....most importantly it offers a lower cost /lower quality option for those that can not get insurance coverage for Vascepa .
    Almost everyone I know on Vascepa has an off label prescription that is covered by their insurance co ...particularly if they are on some Federal employee health plan .
    Vascepa is subject to FDA drug regulations , OmegVia EPA is subject to FDA food regulations ...apparently you dont know the difference

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 3, 2014 1:27 PM Flag

    Thanks for explanation

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 4, 2014 11:55 PM Flag


    Re reading your calculations ...thanks for posting by the way .
    I'm more of the idea that because most in Reduce It are on Lipitor or Crestor ( the Statins used ) ...and these Statins are known since Dec 2011 ( ie after the FDA guidelines /estimate of event rate of 5.2% in RI population ) being capable of causing in a regression of coronary atherosclerosis ( as opposed to slowing progression ) ... the event rate will be slower .
    So I dont see an interim analysis in late 2015 .
    Can you run your calcs on a 4.9% event rate

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 5, 2014 1:25 AM Flag

    OK. Thanks ....

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 7, 2014 12:58 AM Flag

    As some one who has swallowed more OmagiaVia EPA and Vascepa then most on this board ...I'll offer the following
    OmegiaVia EPA is about 88% EPA , Vascepa about 96% EPA . Both will lower your triglycerides dramatically my case by about 30%
    Vascepa is regulated by the FDA as a drug , OmegiaVia EPA as a food most pharmacists consider OmegiaVia EPA lower quality and quantity EPA

    That being said tho ...OmegiaVia is a lower cost alternative to Vascepa for those that can't get insurance coverage for Vascepa .
    Using Amarins coupon , but no insurance coverage , Vascepa currently costs me about $5 a day for 4 gms
    OmegiaVia EPA would cost me about half that for 4 gms

    Why not use OmegiaVia EPA ....well I often had trouble with the delivery ...left by UPS on my driveway all afternoon in full sun . With Vascepa I can pick it up from Walgreens knowing it is in perfect condition ....and since I'm high risk , I need my meds in perfect condition

    Those that have great insurance coverage get Vascepa for less then $40 a month need to even consider OmegiaVia EPA

  • akanz2 akanz2 Sep 7, 2014 1:05 AM Flag

    As a follow up
    Vascepa does not need the enteric coating's at least 96% pure EPA . Those fish oils of lower quality or containing DHA use the enteric coating to reduce fishy burps

0.5372+0.0561(+11.66%)Feb 26 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.